Meeting the Other: Changing Attitudes Despite Intractable Conflicts—A Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT With rising numbers and increasing complexity of long‐living conflicts, the effect of contact interventions is tested in that context. This meta‐analysis investigated the effect contact interventions have on outgroup‐attitudes in the context of a highly intractable conflict. Publications were included, if they quantitatively assessed a contact intervention with samples collected in the context of a highly intractable conflict, either still active or politically resolved, and assessed attitude toward the outgroup they met as a dependent variable. With these criteria, 38 publications with 57 samples and 143 outcomes were included. The influence methodological rigorousness has on the effect sizes in the primary studies is low. The present results suggest that contact interventions are associated with improved attitude toward the outgroup; however, this result is accompanied by high heterogeneity, suggesting high degree of uncertainty in the estimation of the main effect. Further, the mix of correlational and experimental studies makes causal inferences difficult.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13090
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meeting the Other: Changing Attitudes Despite Intractable Conflicts—A Meta‐Analysis

Jürgen Maes, Rahel Geppert, Rainer Leonhart
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Meeting the Other: Changing Attitudes Despite Intractable Conflicts—A Meta‐Analysis

Jürgen Maes, Rahel Geppert, Rainer Leonhart
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT With rising numbers and increasing complexity of long‐living conflicts, the effect of contact interventions is tested in that context. This meta‐analysis investigated the effect contact interventions have on outgroup‐attitudes in the context of a highly intractable conflict. Publications were included, if they quantitatively assessed a contact intervention with samples collected in the context of a highly intractable conflict, either still active or politically resolved, and assessed attitude toward the outgroup they met as a dependent variable. With these criteria, 38 publications with 57 samples and 143 outcomes were included. The influence methodological rigorousness has on the effect sizes in the primary studies is low. The present results suggest that contact interventions are associated with improved attitude toward the outgroup; however, this result is accompanied by high heterogeneity, suggesting high degree of uncertainty in the estimation of the main effect. Further, the mix of correlational and experimental studies makes causal inferences difficult.

Journal of Applied Social PsychologyVol. 55(4)
University of Freiburg (DE), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.