Assessing the acceptance of modal shift policy among shippers and logistics providers

Since 1992, European transport policy has emphasized a shift to more eco-friendly transport modes, such as rail and inland waterways, to reduce the dominance of road transport. However, this policy direction has met with limited success, presenting a significant problem setting: the challenge of gaining acceptance for modal shift policies in the freight transport sector. To address this issue, this study aims to assess the acceptance of modal shift policies among shippers and logistics service providers. Using a mixed-methods approach including 131 survey responses and one focus group discussion, with a geographical focus on Austria, Germany and the Benelux countries, this research examines the acceptance of modal shift policies, categorized into push, and pull strategies, through five hypotheses. The results show a strong preference for pull measures and emphasize the need for EU-wide policy harmonization and improved infrastructure to increase the competitiveness of eco-friendly transport modes. • No significant difference in modal shift policy acceptance by shippers and LSPs • Previous experience influences shipper and LSP acceptance of modal shift policies • Shippers and LSPs prefer pull measures (incentive) over push measures (taxation) • Harmonization of the regulatory framework across Europe remains a major challenge

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Policy
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.010
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Maritime Ports and Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the acceptance of modal shift policy among shippers and logistics providers

Matthew J. Roorda, Christa Sys, Lisa-Maria Putz, Denise Beil
6 citations
Transport Policy
Maritime Ports and Logistics
7.45
article

Assessing the acceptance of modal shift policy among shippers and logistics providers

Matthew J. Roorda, Christa Sys, Lisa-Maria Putz, Denise Beil
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Since 1992, European transport policy has emphasized a shift to more eco-friendly transport modes, such as rail and inland waterways, to reduce the dominance of road transport. However, this policy direction has met with limited success, presenting a significant problem setting: the challenge of gaining acceptance for modal shift policies in the freight transport sector. To address this issue, this study aims to assess the acceptance of modal shift policies among shippers and logistics service providers. Using a mixed-methods approach including 131 survey responses and one focus group discussion, with a geographical focus on Austria, Germany and the Benelux countries, this research examines the acceptance of modal shift policies, categorized into push, and pull strategies, through five hypotheses. The results show a strong preference for pull measures and emphasize the need for EU-wide policy harmonization and improved infrastructure to increase the competitiveness of eco-friendly transport modes. • No significant difference in modal shift policy acceptance by shippers and LSPs • Previous experience influences shipper and LSP acceptance of modal shift policies • Shippers and LSPs prefer pull measures (incentive) over push measures (taxation) • Harmonization of the regulatory framework across Europe remains a major challenge

Transport PolicyVol. 166
University of Antwerp (BE), University of Toronto (CA), University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Maritime Ports and Logistics
7.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.