Who watches what and why it matters: Attention allocation, tug-of-war, and market resiliency: A pre-registered report

We propose to examine how attention disparities between retail and institutional investors affect market resiliency through their trading patterns across overnight and intraday periods. Using U.S. equity market data from 2010 to 2024, we will employ panel regressions to test whether intense tug-of-war periods, particularly during high retail attention episodes, lead to lower market resiliency due to arbitrageurs' overcorrection of perceived mispricing. We expect these effects to be more pronounced during macroeconomic announcements that differentially capture retail versus institutional attention. We aim to contribute new insights into market efficiency and stability in an environment of increasing retail participation, with implications for market design and regulation. • We examine attention disparities between retail and institutional investors and their impact on market resiliency. • We test whether intense retail-institutional trading conflicts (tug-of-war) reduce market resiliency due to arbitrageurs' overcorrection of perceived mispricing. • This study contributes to the understanding of market efficiency and stability in an environment of increasing retail participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102730
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who watches what and why it matters: Attention allocation, tug-of-war, and market resiliency: A pre-registered report

Petko S. Kalev, Xiao Tian, Alexander Lee, James Marchetti
1 citations
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
article

Who watches what and why it matters: Attention allocation, tug-of-war, and market resiliency: A pre-registered report

Petko S. Kalev, Xiao Tian, Alexander Lee, James Marchetti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We propose to examine how attention disparities between retail and institutional investors affect market resiliency through their trading patterns across overnight and intraday periods. Using U.S. equity market data from 2010 to 2024, we will employ panel regressions to test whether intense tug-of-war periods, particularly during high retail attention episodes, lead to lower market resiliency due to arbitrageurs' overcorrection of perceived mispricing. We expect these effects to be more pronounced during macroeconomic announcements that differentially capture retail versus institutional attention. We aim to contribute new insights into market efficiency and stability in an environment of increasing retail participation, with implications for market design and regulation. • We examine attention disparities between retail and institutional investors and their impact on market resiliency. • We test whether intense retail-institutional trading conflicts (tug-of-war) reduce market resiliency due to arbitrageurs' overcorrection of perceived mispricing. • This study contributes to the understanding of market efficiency and stability in an environment of increasing retail participation.

Pacific-Basin Finance JournalVol. 91
University of National and World Economy (BG), Hazen and Sawyer (United States) (US), Rosetta Stone (United States) (US), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.