Conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia for lower limb tumescent liposuction: a randomized clinical trial

Background & Objectives: Liposuction is being increasingly done as a daycare procedure under spinal anesthesia. The aim of daycare surgery is to have fast recovery of psychomotor and cognitive functions, that allow early discharge of the patients. This study was done to compare conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia in lower limb liposuction procedures in terms of time to discharge, patient satisfaction and redo rate. Methodology: We recruited 108 female patients, and randomly allocated them into either a conventional spinal group (Group CS), that received 15 mg of bupivacaine or a diluted spinal group (Group DS) that received a diluted 7.5 mg bupivacaine. All patients underwent tumescent liposuction. The primary outcome was to assess time to home readiness and secondary outcome was patient satisfaction, the incidence of complications and the redo rate. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance test, Student’s t‑test, Whitney U test and Chi‑square tests. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: The Group DS was found to have a significantly less duration of hospital stay (216.89 ± 34.99 min) as compared to Group CS (302.23 ± 22.35 min) (P < 0.001). Patients in DS group were found to have a significantly high satisfaction score as compared to Group CS (P < 0.001). Overall Incidence of complications was found to be less in Group DS as compared to Group CS (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of a diluted, lower dosage of bupivacaine intrathecally provides early discharge with satisfactory anesthesia in lower limb liposuction procedures. The complication and redo rates were also significantly less with the use of diluted bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Keywords: Lower limb liposuction; Bupivacaine; Discharge time; Patient satisfaction; Complications Citation: Abdelmoaty Elfeky HA, Bahgat N, Abdelsalam Elmilegy AA, Habeeb RM. Conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia for lower limb tumescent liposuction: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(6):990-995; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i6.2616 Received: April 13, 2024; Revised: February 21, 2024; Accepted: July 05, 2024

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v28i6.2616
Primary Topic
Body Contouring and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia for lower limb tumescent liposuction: a randomized clinical trial

Hanaa Abouelfetouh Abdelmoaty Elfeky, Ayman A Abdelsalam Elmeligy Elmeligy, Nadia M. Bahgat, Rabab M. Habeeb
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Body Contouring and Surgery
article

Conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia for lower limb tumescent liposuction: a randomized clinical trial

Hanaa Abouelfetouh Abdelmoaty Elfeky, Ayman A Abdelsalam Elmeligy Elmeligy, Nadia M. Bahgat, Rabab M. Habeeb
article en

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Liposuction is being increasingly done as a daycare procedure under spinal anesthesia. The aim of daycare surgery is to have fast recovery of psychomotor and cognitive functions, that allow early discharge of the patients. This study was done to compare conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia in lower limb liposuction procedures in terms of time to discharge, patient satisfaction and redo rate. Methodology: We recruited 108 female patients, and randomly allocated them into either a conventional spinal group (Group CS), that received 15 mg of bupivacaine or a diluted spinal group (Group DS) that received a diluted 7.5 mg bupivacaine. All patients underwent tumescent liposuction. The primary outcome was to assess time to home readiness and secondary outcome was patient satisfaction, the incidence of complications and the redo rate. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance test, Student’s t‑test, Whitney U test and Chi‑square tests. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: The Group DS was found to have a significantly less duration of hospital stay (216.89 ± 34.99 min) as compared to Group CS (302.23 ± 22.35 min) (P < 0.001). Patients in DS group were found to have a significantly high satisfaction score as compared to Group CS (P < 0.001). Overall Incidence of complications was found to be less in Group DS as compared to Group CS (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of a diluted, lower dosage of bupivacaine intrathecally provides early discharge with satisfactory anesthesia in lower limb liposuction procedures. The complication and redo rates were also significantly less with the use of diluted bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Keywords: Lower limb liposuction; Bupivacaine; Discharge time; Patient satisfaction; Complications Citation: Abdelmoaty Elfeky HA, Bahgat N, Abdelsalam Elmilegy AA, Habeeb RM. Conventional versus diluted spinal anesthesia for lower limb tumescent liposuction: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(6):990-995; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i6.2616 Received: April 13, 2024; Revised: February 21, 2024; Accepted: July 05, 2024

Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareVol. 28(6)
Menofia University
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Body Contouring and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.