Evaluation of satellite-based rainfall estimates over the IGAD region of Eastern Africa

Satellite precipitation (rainfall) products have become increasingly valuable in the delivery of climate services in recent years, particularly in Africa, where the network of synoptic stations has been gradually declining. The Satellites-based Rainfall Estimates (SREs) are estimates and measurements; thus, accuracy is of major concern. This study gives a detailed long-term comparison and evaluation of nine (9) SREs from 2001 to 2020 over East Africa. The study used 105 rain gauge observations and gridded 9 SRE products. The statistical methods such as rainfall totals, annual cycle, 24 continuous, categorical, and volumetric metrics, scatter plots, the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF), and colored code portraits were employed to assess the temporal and spatial patterns of SREs performance. The evaluation was conducted at each 105-rain gauge spatially and in five sub-regions for different metrics and performance comparisons during March–May (MAM), June–September (JJAS), and October-December (OND). Our findings demonstrate that relying on a single metric for validating the performance of SREs is not sufficient. Instead, it is necessary to utilize multiple metrics to assess rainfall performance, especially in areas with complex topography such as mountains and diverse climatic zones. The spatial patterns of validation of nine SREs showed CMORPH RT, CHIRPS v2.0, CPC-RFEv2, and GPM-IMERG are the top four best-performing SREs. The CMORPH RT emerged the best-performing SRE, followed by CHIRPS v2.0. Also, the satellite products tend to slightly underestimate the rainfall throughout the region. Geographically, SREs performed well over highlands compared to desert and semi-arid regions, while seasonally, the accuracy of SRE was lower over JJAS compared to MAM and OND. This study further demonstrated that the density and distribution of synoptic stations (rain gauges) in a country play a significant role in the accuracy of validation. These findings shows that SREs play complementary roles in the accurate monitoring and analysis of precipitation and provide comprehensive coverage, especially in remote areas where ground-based measurements are sparse. These findings serve as guidance to climate service providers and end-users on how to select suitable alternative rainfall datasets for different applications and feedback to the algorithm developers to improve the SRE products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-025-01068-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of satellite-based rainfall estimates over the IGAD region of Eastern Africa

Nzioka John Muthama, Josiah M. Kinama, Zachary Atheru, Christopher Oludhe et al.
3 citations
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
3.90
article

Evaluation of satellite-based rainfall estimates over the IGAD region of Eastern Africa

Nzioka John Muthama, Josiah M. Kinama, Zachary Atheru, Christopher Oludhe, Paulino Omoj Omay, Guleid Artan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Satellite precipitation (rainfall) products have become increasingly valuable in the delivery of climate services in recent years, particularly in Africa, where the network of synoptic stations has been gradually declining. The Satellites-based Rainfall Estimates (SREs) are estimates and measurements; thus, accuracy is of major concern. This study gives a detailed long-term comparison and evaluation of nine (9) SREs from 2001 to 2020 over East Africa. The study used 105 rain gauge observations and gridded 9 SRE products. The statistical methods such as rainfall totals, annual cycle, 24 continuous, categorical, and volumetric metrics, scatter plots, the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF), and colored code portraits were employed to assess the temporal and spatial patterns of SREs performance. The evaluation was conducted at each 105-rain gauge spatially and in five sub-regions for different metrics and performance comparisons during March–May (MAM), June–September (JJAS), and October-December (OND). Our findings demonstrate that relying on a single metric for validating the performance of SREs is not sufficient. Instead, it is necessary to utilize multiple metrics to assess rainfall performance, especially in areas with complex topography such as mountains and diverse climatic zones. The spatial patterns of validation of nine SREs showed CMORPH RT, CHIRPS v2.0, CPC-RFEv2, and GPM-IMERG are the top four best-performing SREs. The CMORPH RT emerged the best-performing SRE, followed by CHIRPS v2.0. Also, the satellite products tend to slightly underestimate the rainfall throughout the region. Geographically, SREs performed well over highlands compared to desert and semi-arid regions, while seasonally, the accuracy of SRE was lower over JJAS compared to MAM and OND. This study further demonstrated that the density and distribution of synoptic stations (rain gauges) in a country play a significant role in the accuracy of validation. These findings shows that SREs play complementary roles in the accurate monitoring and analysis of precipitation and provide comprehensive coverage, especially in remote areas where ground-based measurements are sparse. These findings serve as guidance to climate service providers and end-users on how to select suitable alternative rainfall datasets for different applications and feedback to the algorithm developers to improve the SRE products.

Meteorology and Atmospheric PhysicsVol. 137(2)
University of Nairobi (KE), IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Center (KE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.