Reduction of a Markov decision process with non-linear discounting to a stochastic game with standard total undiscounted criterion

Abstract We consider a Markov decision process (MDP), whose total discounted utility is aggregated recursively with a concave discount function that is not necessarily linear. The state and action spaces are Borel spaces, and the utility function is nonnegative. We show that it can be reduced to a turn-based stochastic game model with the total undiscounted utility. This reduction result is then applied to the MDP problem with recursively aggregated utility to be maximized or cost to be minimized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Operations Research
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-025-06540-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reduction of a Markov decision process with non-linear discounting to a stochastic game with standard total undiscounted criterion

Ė. L. Presman, Alexey Piunovskiy, Yi Zhang, Xinran Zheng
1 citations
Annals of Operations Research
Economic theories and models
3.13
article

Reduction of a Markov decision process with non-linear discounting to a stochastic game with standard total undiscounted criterion

Ė. L. Presman, Alexey Piunovskiy, Yi Zhang, Xinran Zheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We consider a Markov decision process (MDP), whose total discounted utility is aggregated recursively with a concave discount function that is not necessarily linear. The state and action spaces are Borel spaces, and the utility function is nonnegative. We show that it can be reduced to a turn-based stochastic game model with the total undiscounted utility. This reduction result is then applied to the MDP problem with recursively aggregated utility to be maximized or cost to be minimized.

Annals of Operations Research
University of Liverpool (GB), Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (RU), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Economic theories and models
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.