Effect of injection speed of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia on block quality and hemodynamic changes in elective cesarean sections

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% is a standard technique for lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS). However, the impact of injection speed on block quality, hemodynamic stability, and recovery remains unclear. This study compared the effects of slow versus fast injection speeds of hyperbaric bupivacaine on anesthetic outcomes. Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 60 ASA PS-II patients, aged 25–35 years, were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n = 30) received injection over 25 sec, and Group B (n=30) received injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine over 50 sec. Key outcomes included sensory block onset, maximum block level, hemodynamic trends, recovery parameters, analgesia requirements, and adverse events. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. Time to achieve T10 dermatome (Group A: 3.22 ± 0.85 min; Group B: 3.54 ± 0.92 min) and maximum sensory block level (Group A: T6 ± 1.2; Group B: T7 ± 1.4) showed no significant differences. Hemodynamic stability was comparable, with similar hypotension rates (Group A: 10; Group B: 12). Recovery metrics, including sensory block regression (Group A: 15.2 ± 2.1 min; Group B: 16.0 ± 2.3 min) and full recovery time (Group A: 45.7 ± 6.3 min; Group B: 47.1 ± 6.5 min), were slightly faster in Group A but not statistically significant. Rescue analgesia and adverse events were equivalent in the groups. Conclusion: Slow and fast injection speeds of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for LSCS demonstrated equivalent efficacy in block quality, hemodynamic stability, recovery, and safety. These findings support flexibility in injection speed based on clinical context and operator preference. Keywords: Spinal anesthesia; hyperbaric bupivacaine; cesarean section; injection speed; sensory blockade; motor blockade; hemodynamic stability; postoperative pain management; adverse events; maternal safety; neuraxial anesthesia; recovery metrics; obstetric anesthesia Citation: Naveena P, Naveenkumar P, Kumar B. A, Shanmugasundaram S. Choudhary AK, Panneerselvam Periasamy P. Effect of injection speed of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia on block quality and hemodynamic changes in elective cesarean sections. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(1):105-111. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i1.2670 Received: December 12, 2024; Reviewed: December 26, 2024; Accepted: January 01, 2025

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v29i1.2670
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of injection speed of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia on block quality and hemodynamic changes in elective cesarean sections

Arun Kumar B, P Naveena, Panneerselvam Periasamy, Shanu Shanmugasundaram et al.
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Effect of injection speed of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia on block quality and hemodynamic changes in elective cesarean sections

Arun Kumar B, P Naveena, Panneerselvam Periasamy, Shanu Shanmugasundaram, Aashish Choudhary, P Naveenkumar
article en

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% is a standard technique for lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS). However, the impact of injection speed on block quality, hemodynamic stability, and recovery remains unclear. This study compared the effects of slow versus fast injection speeds of hyperbaric bupivacaine on anesthetic outcomes. Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 60 ASA PS-II patients, aged 25–35 years, were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n = 30) received injection over 25 sec, and Group B (n=30) received injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine over 50 sec. Key outcomes included sensory block onset, maximum block level, hemodynamic trends, recovery parameters, analgesia requirements, and adverse events. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. Time to achieve T10 dermatome (Group A: 3.22 ± 0.85 min; Group B: 3.54 ± 0.92 min) and maximum sensory block level (Group A: T6 ± 1.2; Group B: T7 ± 1.4) showed no significant differences. Hemodynamic stability was comparable, with similar hypotension rates (Group A: 10; Group B: 12). Recovery metrics, including sensory block regression (Group A: 15.2 ± 2.1 min; Group B: 16.0 ± 2.3 min) and full recovery time (Group A: 45.7 ± 6.3 min; Group B: 47.1 ± 6.5 min), were slightly faster in Group A but not statistically significant. Rescue analgesia and adverse events were equivalent in the groups. Conclusion: Slow and fast injection speeds of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for LSCS demonstrated equivalent efficacy in block quality, hemodynamic stability, recovery, and safety. These findings support flexibility in injection speed based on clinical context and operator preference. Keywords: Spinal anesthesia; hyperbaric bupivacaine; cesarean section; injection speed; sensory blockade; motor blockade; hemodynamic stability; postoperative pain management; adverse events; maternal safety; neuraxial anesthesia; recovery metrics; obstetric anesthesia Citation: Naveena P, Naveenkumar P, Kumar B. A, Shanmugasundaram S. Choudhary AK, Panneerselvam Periasamy P. Effect of injection speed of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia on block quality and hemodynamic changes in elective cesarean sections. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(1):105-111. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i1.2670 Received: December 12, 2024; Reviewed: December 26, 2024; Accepted: January 01, 2025

Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareVol. 29(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.