A Comparative Analysis of Terminal and Second Order Sliding Mode Controllers for Full Bridge Single Phase Inverters

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Terminal Sliding Mode Control (TSMC) and Super Twisting Sliding Mode Control (SOSMC), in the context of full-bridge single-phase inverters. The controllers are designed to output current control of the single-phase inverter. Simulation studies are performed on MATLAB/Simulink platform to investigate the dynamic responses, steady-state error, ripple magnitude and total harmonic distortion (THD). The results indicate that TSMC offers faster response times but suffers from significant undershoot and higher steady-state errors. Conversely, SOSMC demonstrates superior performance with lower steady-state error, reduced ripple and significantly less harmonic distortion. These findings highlight the relative advantages and disadvantages of each control strategy, providing valuable insights for their application in both academic research and industrial practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon55916.2024.10905434
Primary Topic
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Terminal and Second Order Sliding Mode Controllers for Full Bridge Single Phase Inverters

Naki Güler, Şevki Demirbaş, Ugur Feslı, Samet Ayık
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
article

A Comparative Analysis of Terminal and Second Order Sliding Mode Controllers for Full Bridge Single Phase Inverters

Naki Güler, Şevki Demirbaş, Ugur Feslı, Samet Ayık
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Terminal Sliding Mode Control (TSMC) and Super Twisting Sliding Mode Control (SOSMC), in the context of full-bridge single-phase inverters. The controllers are designed to output current control of the single-phase inverter. Simulation studies are performed on MATLAB/Simulink platform to investigate the dynamic responses, steady-state error, ripple magnitude and total harmonic distortion (THD). The results indicate that TSMC offers faster response times but suffers from significant undershoot and higher steady-state errors. Conversely, SOSMC demonstrates superior performance with lower steady-state error, reduced ripple and significantly less harmonic distortion. These findings highlight the relative advantages and disadvantages of each control strategy, providing valuable insights for their application in both academic research and industrial practice.

Gazi University (TR)
Qatar Foundation, Qatar National Research Fund
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.