Comparing Deep Neural Networks for 1D Multi-Label Power Quality Disturbance Classification: ResNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet

Power quality (PQ) analysis has become increasingly challenging due to the widespread usage of power electronic devices and the variability of operational events in electric grids integrating renewable energy resources. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have emerged as the prevalent approach for identifying PQ disturbances (PQDs). The 1D DNN-based disturbance classification architectures, in contrast to 2D models, operate directly on original waveform measurements, offering sequential views to capture irregular PQDs. However, there remains a research gap on the impact of architectural choices of DNN frameworks in this context, as well as on understanding their robustness to noise and adequacy for multi-output identification tasks. This work delves into three advanced DNN architectures, namely ResNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet, to assess their suitability for 1D PQD classification tasks. The performance of different classification models is compared using synthetic datasets following the IEEE 1159-2019 standard. The results demonstrate that ResNet outperforms MobileNet and DenseNet in terms of average accuracy and noise tolerance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon55916.2024.10905211
Primary Topic
Power Quality and Harmonics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Deep Neural Networks for 1D Multi-Label Power Quality Disturbance Classification: ResNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet

Elisabetta Tedeschi, Hugo Morais, Rui Henriques, Han Shao
Power Quality and Harmonics
article

Comparing Deep Neural Networks for 1D Multi-Label Power Quality Disturbance Classification: ResNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet

Elisabetta Tedeschi, Hugo Morais, Rui Henriques, Han Shao
article en

Abstract

Power quality (PQ) analysis has become increasingly challenging due to the widespread usage of power electronic devices and the variability of operational events in electric grids integrating renewable energy resources. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have emerged as the prevalent approach for identifying PQ disturbances (PQDs). The 1D DNN-based disturbance classification architectures, in contrast to 2D models, operate directly on original waveform measurements, offering sequential views to capture irregular PQDs. However, there remains a research gap on the impact of architectural choices of DNN frameworks in this context, as well as on understanding their robustness to noise and adequacy for multi-output identification tasks. This work delves into three advanced DNN architectures, namely ResNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet, to assess their suitability for 1D PQD classification tasks. The performance of different classification models is compared using synthetic datasets following the IEEE 1159-2019 standard. The results demonstrate that ResNet outperforms MobileNet and DenseNet in terms of average accuracy and noise tolerance.

Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Power Quality and Harmonics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Deep Neural Networks for 1D Multi-Label Power Quality Disturbance Classification: ResNet, MobileNet, and DenseNet — Elisabetta Tedeschi, Hugo Morais, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS