Impact of Protection Devices on the Unavailability Risk of Low-Voltage Direct Current Systems

Many options are available when it comes to protecting low voltage direct current grids. As each type of protection device has different tripping characteristics, they all have their own unavailability risk, which is the cost of unavailability. This paper proposes a method that uses transition frequency densities to determine the unavailability risk. These transition frequency densities are determined through a semi-Markov process and are used to calculate the unavailability risk of a simple use case as presented in a numerical illustration. Fuses are the most cost-effective type of protection device for the presented numerical illustration, however, cannot be used under all circumstances. Solid state circuit breakers are to be used in highly critical systems, mechanical circuit breakers when the cost of outage is relatively low and hybrid circuit breakers in between.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon55916.2024.10905201
Primary Topic
Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Protection Devices on the Unavailability Risk of Low-Voltage Direct Current Systems

Johan Driesen, Glenn Emmers
Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
article

Impact of Protection Devices on the Unavailability Risk of Low-Voltage Direct Current Systems

Johan Driesen, Glenn Emmers
article en

Abstract

Many options are available when it comes to protecting low voltage direct current grids. As each type of protection device has different tripping characteristics, they all have their own unavailability risk, which is the cost of unavailability. This paper proposes a method that uses transition frequency densities to determine the unavailability risk. These transition frequency densities are determined through a semi-Markov process and are used to calculate the unavailability risk of a simple use case as presented in a numerical illustration. Fuses are the most cost-effective type of protection device for the presented numerical illustration, however, cannot be used under all circumstances. Solid state circuit breakers are to be used in highly critical systems, mechanical circuit breakers when the cost of outage is relatively low and hybrid circuit breakers in between.

Engie (Belgium) (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.