Experimental Efficiency Comparison Between the LLC Resonant Converter and the Phase Shifted Full Bridge Converter Operating as Battery Chargers

DC-DC conversion in electric vehicle chargers can require a single or multiple stages depending on both electrical architecture and amount of processed power. When isolation is provided by an output stage, a unidirectional isolated DC-DC converter is required. Among the possible candidates, the LLC resonant converter and the phase shifted full-bridge (FSFB) converter show several advantages which has made them preferred choices in recent literature. This paper compares the efficiency of both converters on equal basis under the variable load conditions imposed by a cycle of the conventional constant-current constant-voltage (CC-CV) charging protocol. To support the study, scale-down experimental prototypes of both converters have been implemented and evaluated in laboratory showing the superiority of the LLC resonant converter for almost the entire range of operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon55916.2024.10905314
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced DC-DC Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Efficiency Comparison Between the LLC Resonant Converter and the Phase Shifted Full Bridge Converter Operating as Battery Chargers

Oswaldo López‐Santos, David Zambrano-Prada, Carlos Andrés Torres-Pinzón, Freddy Flores‐Bahamonde et al.
1 citations
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.21
article

Experimental Efficiency Comparison Between the LLC Resonant Converter and the Phase Shifted Full Bridge Converter Operating as Battery Chargers

Oswaldo López‐Santos, David Zambrano-Prada, Carlos Andrés Torres-Pinzón, Freddy Flores‐Bahamonde, L. Martı́nez-Salamero, Hugo Valderrama‐Blavi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

DC-DC conversion in electric vehicle chargers can require a single or multiple stages depending on both electrical architecture and amount of processed power. When isolation is provided by an output stage, a unidirectional isolated DC-DC converter is required. Among the possible candidates, the LLC resonant converter and the phase shifted full-bridge (FSFB) converter show several advantages which has made them preferred choices in recent literature. This paper compares the efficiency of both converters on equal basis under the variable load conditions imposed by a cycle of the conventional constant-current constant-voltage (CC-CV) charging protocol. To support the study, scale-down experimental prototypes of both converters have been implemented and evaluated in laboratory showing the superiority of the LLC resonant converter for almost the entire range of operation.

Universidad Santo Tomás (CO), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experimental Efficiency Comparison Between the LLC Resonant Converter and the Phase Shifted Full Bridge Converter Operating as Battery Chargers — Oswaldo López‐Santos, David Zambrano-Prada, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS