The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems

A challenge in adapting the concept of affective polarization to multiparty systems has been to determine who is polarized against whom. I propose a strategy to uncover the different ways in which people construe the political field – that is, how they categorize the party landscape in terms of “us” and “them” from commonly-used survey data. Using 2023 panel data from Germany, a multiparty democracy, I show that people are polarized in opposing camps along three different divides: between Left and Right, between Mainstream and Rightwing Populists, and between Center and Extreme. To understand what people are polarized over, I explore the issue differences that underpin each of the divides. Lastly, I examine the associations between affective polarization and democratic attitudes across camps and find considerable variation in those associations. This variation suggests that perhaps not all affective polarization should be seen as equally problematic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electoral Studies
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102908
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems

Adrian Rothers
2 citations
Electoral Studies
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
article

The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems

Adrian Rothers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A challenge in adapting the concept of affective polarization to multiparty systems has been to determine who is polarized against whom. I propose a strategy to uncover the different ways in which people construe the political field – that is, how they categorize the party landscape in terms of “us” and “them” from commonly-used survey data. Using 2023 panel data from Germany, a multiparty democracy, I show that people are polarized in opposing camps along three different divides: between Left and Right, between Mainstream and Rightwing Populists, and between Center and Extreme. To understand what people are polarized over, I explore the issue differences that underpin each of the divides. Lastly, I examine the associations between affective polarization and democratic attitudes across camps and find considerable variation in those associations. This variation suggests that perhaps not all affective polarization should be seen as equally problematic.

Electoral StudiesVol. 95
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The poles in polarization: Social categorization and affective polarization in multiparty systems — Adrian Rothers · Electoral Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS