Inactivation of Viruses by Charged Cinnamaldehyde Nanoemulsions

Viral pathogens are a considerable public health burden, and so inactivating viruses in the environment is critical. This study compared the antiviral activity of cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsions (CNE) and cinnamaldehyde oil (CNO) on a non-enveloped norovirus surrogate bacteriophage (MS2) and an enveloped human coronavirus 229E (HuCoV-229E). MS2 bacteriophage and HuCoV-229E were treated with different concentrations of CNE or CNO (0.5-3.5%). After treatment for 1 h, the reduction in MS2 numbers was significantly less for the CNE than for the CNO. For instance, the log reductions in MS2 numbers were 4.02 ± 0.10 and 2.78 ± 0.34 PFU/mL after treatment with 3.5% and 0.5% of CNO, whereas they were only 1.54 ± 0.08 and 0 PFU/mL after treatment with the equivalent CNE, respectively. Conversely, a significant reduction in HuCoV-229E was observed for the nanoemulsion-based treatment at high cinnamaldehyde levels. Specifically, when treated with 0.5% cinnamaldehyde, there was a 1.35 ± 0.23 and 3.08 ± 0.17 log PFU/mL reduction for the CNE and CNO treatments, but when treated with 2.5% cinnamaldehyde, there was a 5.98 ± 0.12 and 4.43 ± 0.38 log PFU/mL reduction, respectively. These results suggest that the efficiency of the essential oil as a disinfectant against coronavirus-229E can be increased when it is incorporated in a nanoemulsion at an appropriate concentration. The better efficacy of the nanoemulsion formulations against coronavirus-229E than against MS2 bacteriophage may have been because the cinnamaldehyde oil droplets could penetrate into and deactivate enveloped viruses more effectively than non-enveloped ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14060931
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inactivation of Viruses by Charged Cinnamaldehyde Nanoemulsions

David Julian McClements, Matthew D. Moore, Amanda J. Kinchla, Pragathi Kamarasu et al.
3 citations
Foods
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
4.19
article

Inactivation of Viruses by Charged Cinnamaldehyde Nanoemulsions

David Julian McClements, Matthew D. Moore, Amanda J. Kinchla, Pragathi Kamarasu, Minji Kim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Viral pathogens are a considerable public health burden, and so inactivating viruses in the environment is critical. This study compared the antiviral activity of cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsions (CNE) and cinnamaldehyde oil (CNO) on a non-enveloped norovirus surrogate bacteriophage (MS2) and an enveloped human coronavirus 229E (HuCoV-229E). MS2 bacteriophage and HuCoV-229E were treated with different concentrations of CNE or CNO (0.5-3.5%). After treatment for 1 h, the reduction in MS2 numbers was significantly less for the CNE than for the CNO. For instance, the log reductions in MS2 numbers were 4.02 ± 0.10 and 2.78 ± 0.34 PFU/mL after treatment with 3.5% and 0.5% of CNO, whereas they were only 1.54 ± 0.08 and 0 PFU/mL after treatment with the equivalent CNE, respectively. Conversely, a significant reduction in HuCoV-229E was observed for the nanoemulsion-based treatment at high cinnamaldehyde levels. Specifically, when treated with 0.5% cinnamaldehyde, there was a 1.35 ± 0.23 and 3.08 ± 0.17 log PFU/mL reduction for the CNE and CNO treatments, but when treated with 2.5% cinnamaldehyde, there was a 5.98 ± 0.12 and 4.43 ± 0.38 log PFU/mL reduction, respectively. These results suggest that the efficiency of the essential oil as a disinfectant against coronavirus-229E can be increased when it is incorporated in a nanoemulsion at an appropriate concentration. The better efficacy of the nanoemulsion formulations against coronavirus-229E than against MS2 bacteriophage may have been because the cinnamaldehyde oil droplets could penetrate into and deactivate enveloped viruses more effectively than non-enveloped ones.

FoodsVol. 14(6)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.