Explainable Supervised Learning Models for Aviation Predictions in Australia

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated success across various industries; however, its adoption in aviation remains limited due to concerns regarding the interpretability of AI models, which often function as black box systems with opaque decision-making processes. Given the safety-critical nature of aviation, the lack of transparency in AI-generated predictions poses significant challenges for industry stakeholders. This study investigates the classification performance of multiple supervised machine learning models and employs SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) to provide global model explanations, identifying key features that influence decision boundaries. To address the issue of class imbalance in the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) dataset, a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is also employed for data augmentation. A comparative evaluation of four machine learning algorithms is conducted for a three-class classification task:—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and a deep neural network (DNN) comprising five hidden layers. The results demonstrate a competitive performance across accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics, highlighting the effectiveness of explainable AI techniques in enhancing model transparency and fostering trust in AI-driven aviation safety applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12030223
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Supervised Learning Models for Aviation Predictions in Australia

Keith Joiner, Graham Wild, Aziida Nanyonga, Hassan Wasswa et al.
3 citations
Aerospace
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
article

Explainable Supervised Learning Models for Aviation Predictions in Australia

Keith Joiner, Graham Wild, Aziida Nanyonga, Hassan Wasswa, Uğur Turhan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated success across various industries; however, its adoption in aviation remains limited due to concerns regarding the interpretability of AI models, which often function as black box systems with opaque decision-making processes. Given the safety-critical nature of aviation, the lack of transparency in AI-generated predictions poses significant challenges for industry stakeholders. This study investigates the classification performance of multiple supervised machine learning models and employs SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) to provide global model explanations, identifying key features that influence decision boundaries. To address the issue of class imbalance in the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) dataset, a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) is also employed for data augmentation. A comparative evaluation of four machine learning algorithms is conducted for a three-class classification task:—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and a deep neural network (DNN) comprising five hidden layers. The results demonstrate a competitive performance across accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics, highlighting the effectiveness of explainable AI techniques in enhancing model transparency and fostering trust in AI-driven aviation safety applications.

AerospaceVol. 12(3)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.