Pilot project on patient profiles: a tool for sharing clinical experiences

Diagnostic systems and other established typologies do not facilitate comparison of clinical experiences in a collegial community. New tools are needed for sharing clinical experiences in order to identify patients who will benefit from similar approaches. These tools should serve as a common language spanning different therapeutic approaches and professional backgrounds. We present a pilot project from an outpatient clinic for substance use disorders in Oslo where we developed what we call ‘patient profiles’. The purpose was to explore whether systematically articulating and comparing clinicians’ intuitive knowledge can provide a starting point for categories of experience sharing and knowledge development. Research into intuitive knowledge and the grounded theory method were used as the basis for developing the patient profiles. A key prerequisite was that the method could be applied in a clinical setting. We developed the profiles in a stepwise process that included systematically articulating and comparing three clinicians' intuitive experiences of similarity for all patients on their respective patient lists, and then presenting and discussing the profiles in a collegial community. We arrived at three patient profiles: A, B and C. The outpatient clinic has used these profiles to compare clinical experiences. We found that we gained more insight into our colleagues' approaches and experiences and that challenges associated with each profile shared common features. Patient profiles are explicitly a local categorisation that is useful in sharing clinical experiences wherever the profiles are developed. Our profiles are not necessarily representative of other outpatient clinics for substance use. One advantage of articulating tacit and intuitive knowledge is that it offers clinicians the opportunity to nuance, reflect on and correct stereotypes and biases in treatment cultures. Furthermore, we envisage more direct investigations into whether patient profiles facilitate comparison of treatment experiences. Keywords: intuitive knowledge, experience-based knowledge, clinical experience sharing, substance use disorders

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52734/fcth6544
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilot project on patient profiles: a tool for sharing clinical experiences

Mette Nordbrønd Mikkelsen, Espen Ajo Arnevik, Sigurd Syrdal Aanderaa, Linn Bjerknes
Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening
Mental Health and Psychiatry
article

Pilot project on patient profiles: a tool for sharing clinical experiences

Mette Nordbrønd Mikkelsen, Espen Ajo Arnevik, Sigurd Syrdal Aanderaa, Linn Bjerknes
article en

Abstract

Diagnostic systems and other established typologies do not facilitate comparison of clinical experiences in a collegial community. New tools are needed for sharing clinical experiences in order to identify patients who will benefit from similar approaches. These tools should serve as a common language spanning different therapeutic approaches and professional backgrounds. We present a pilot project from an outpatient clinic for substance use disorders in Oslo where we developed what we call ‘patient profiles’. The purpose was to explore whether systematically articulating and comparing clinicians’ intuitive knowledge can provide a starting point for categories of experience sharing and knowledge development. Research into intuitive knowledge and the grounded theory method were used as the basis for developing the patient profiles. A key prerequisite was that the method could be applied in a clinical setting. We developed the profiles in a stepwise process that included systematically articulating and comparing three clinicians' intuitive experiences of similarity for all patients on their respective patient lists, and then presenting and discussing the profiles in a collegial community. We arrived at three patient profiles: A, B and C. The outpatient clinic has used these profiles to compare clinical experiences. We found that we gained more insight into our colleagues' approaches and experiences and that challenges associated with each profile shared common features. Patient profiles are explicitly a local categorisation that is useful in sharing clinical experiences wherever the profiles are developed. Our profiles are not necessarily representative of other outpatient clinics for substance use. One advantage of articulating tacit and intuitive knowledge is that it offers clinicians the opportunity to nuance, reflect on and correct stereotypes and biases in treatment cultures. Furthermore, we envisage more direct investigations into whether patient profiles facilitate comparison of treatment experiences. Keywords: intuitive knowledge, experience-based knowledge, clinical experience sharing, substance use disorders

Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.