:<i>Cybernetic Aesthetics: Modernist Networks of Information and Data</i>

To my mind, where this project is perhaps not entirely gratifying is its turn to the second-order cybernetics of the latter half of the century. In the fourth chapter of the book, Love directs her focus to Gertrude Stein’s Lectures in America (1934), suggesting that it can be productively read alongside the anthropologist Mary Catherine Bateson’s work from the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s. In both writers, Love sees a cybernetic interest in culture as thoroughly patterned and argues that both can, in part, be understood through their shared commitment to self-reflexivity. Technology here serves a kind of metaphor for Stein and Bateson, allowing them each to analogize “our socio-cultural environments and our place within them” (110). In this chapter, the necessity of cybernetics as a central term feels somewhat attenuated. While Bateson and Stein share a set of common concerns and strategies for thinking about culture, I wonder if their projects are motivated by the same “dizzying informational matrix” that so clearly links modernism and cybernetics in the first half of the century. Given that cybernetics itself is a field that has no unified definition, I find the movement from the first-order cybernetics to second-order cybernetics suggestive but perhaps lacking the narrow focus that makes the early chapters so convincing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Philology
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/735078
Primary Topic
Art, Technology, and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

:Cybernetic Aesthetics: Modernist Networks of Information and Data

Timothy Wientzen
Modern Philology
Art, Technology, and Culture
article

:Cybernetic Aesthetics: Modernist Networks of Information and Data

Timothy Wientzen
article en

Abstract

To my mind, where this project is perhaps not entirely gratifying is its turn to the second-order cybernetics of the latter half of the century. In the fourth chapter of the book, Love directs her focus to Gertrude Stein’s Lectures in America (1934), suggesting that it can be productively read alongside the anthropologist Mary Catherine Bateson’s work from the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s. In both writers, Love sees a cybernetic interest in culture as thoroughly patterned and argues that both can, in part, be understood through their shared commitment to self-reflexivity. Technology here serves a kind of metaphor for Stein and Bateson, allowing them each to analogize “our socio-cultural environments and our place within them” (110). In this chapter, the necessity of cybernetics as a central term feels somewhat attenuated. While Bateson and Stein share a set of common concerns and strategies for thinking about culture, I wonder if their projects are motivated by the same “dizzying informational matrix” that so clearly links modernism and cybernetics in the first half of the century. Given that cybernetics itself is a field that has no unified definition, I find the movement from the first-order cybernetics to second-order cybernetics suggestive but perhaps lacking the narrow focus that makes the early chapters so convincing.

Modern PhilologyVol. 122(4)
Skidmore College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Art, Technology, and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.