Forced mindset shift and the non-negotiables on the use of AI: Comparative perspectives from public administration, general education, mathematics, and language instructors

This study explores the comparative perspectives of instructors in public administration, general education mathematics, and language education on the forced shift in mindset and non-negotiables surrounding AI integration in their fields. The research aims to compare how these instructors perceived AI’s role in education before its widespread adoption and how their views and teaching practices have evolved in response. Through a qualitative design in an exploratory approach utilizing semi-structured interviews with educators in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines, the study reveals that while the acceptance of AI has grown, certain non-negotiable teaching practices remain firmly upheld. These practices reflect the educators’ core beliefs about the irreplaceable human elements in teaching, despite the increasing reliance on AI. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of the balance between embracing AI advancements and maintaining educational values across different academic disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3111
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forced mindset shift and the non-negotiables on the use of AI: Comparative perspectives from public administration, general education, mathematics, and language instructors

Nelson Julhamid, Javier Ballesteros, Masnona S. Asiri, Mailen A. Antao et al.
Environment and Social Psychology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Forced mindset shift and the non-negotiables on the use of AI: Comparative perspectives from public administration, general education, mathematics, and language instructors

Nelson Julhamid, Javier Ballesteros, Masnona S. Asiri, Mailen A. Antao, Valentino B. Ting, Alnakier A. Sarabi, Ricky S. Morales, Norenna S. Sarahadil, S L McElroy, Abdel J. Amilhamja, Tanny T. Lim, Raugda J. Julhamid
article en

Abstract

This study explores the comparative perspectives of instructors in public administration, general education mathematics, and language education on the forced shift in mindset and non-negotiables surrounding AI integration in their fields. The research aims to compare how these instructors perceived AI’s role in education before its widespread adoption and how their views and teaching practices have evolved in response. Through a qualitative design in an exploratory approach utilizing semi-structured interviews with educators in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines, the study reveals that while the acceptance of AI has grown, certain non-negotiable teaching practices remain firmly upheld. These practices reflect the educators’ core beliefs about the irreplaceable human elements in teaching, despite the increasing reliance on AI. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of the balance between embracing AI advancements and maintaining educational values across different academic disciplines.

Environment and Social PsychologyVol. 10(2)
Sulzer (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.