Empirical Tort Law (and Theory) – An Essay in Honor of Deborah Hensler

Abstract In this essay to honor Deborah Hensler, we summarize an update to her classic study on claiming behavior and explore its policy implications. More specifically, we empirically document how those with significant medical conditions utilize the civil liability system, particularly in terms of making claims against others, seeking the advice of legal professionals, and initiating litigation. We find that few who are injured or fall ill believe that another party is responsible, and even among that group, relatively few seek compensation against that party. Still fewer contact attorneys or file a lawsuit. Our findings have implications for the social welfare system, the role of tort law, and the way the selection of cases shapes the common-law. In particular, the significant non-random winnowing of the universe of harms litigated we observe can result in normatively undesirable path-dependence in the evolution of the common law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tort Law
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jtl-2025-0004
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Tort Law (and Theory) – An Essay in Honor of Deborah Hensler

James M. Anderson, Maya Buenaventura, Nicholas M. Pace, Amy Mahler
Journal of Tort Law
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Empirical Tort Law (and Theory) – An Essay in Honor of Deborah Hensler

James M. Anderson, Maya Buenaventura, Nicholas M. Pace, Amy Mahler
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this essay to honor Deborah Hensler, we summarize an update to her classic study on claiming behavior and explore its policy implications. More specifically, we empirically document how those with significant medical conditions utilize the civil liability system, particularly in terms of making claims against others, seeking the advice of legal professionals, and initiating litigation. We find that few who are injured or fall ill believe that another party is responsible, and even among that group, relatively few seek compensation against that party. Still fewer contact attorneys or file a lawsuit. Our findings have implications for the social welfare system, the role of tort law, and the way the selection of cases shapes the common-law. In particular, the significant non-random winnowing of the universe of harms litigated we observe can result in normatively undesirable path-dependence in the evolution of the common law.

Journal of Tort LawVol. 17(2)
RAND Corporation (US), Institute for Law and Justice (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empirical Tort Law (and Theory) – An Essay in Honor of Deborah Hensler — James M. Anderson, Maya Buenaventura, et al. · Journal of Tort Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS