Policing and Carcerality in Public Libraries

Policing in libraries poses a significant barrier to access for many potential patrons—and yet, much of the literature on library security advocates for strong security measures without regard for the safety and wellbeing of patrons and staff who are BIPOC, LGBTQ2SIA+, disabled, and unhoused. Considerable lived experience and research shows that police disproportionately target those whose identities deviate from the norm, but in a society with so many diverse experiences, identities, and relationships to power and authority, we are obligated as socially conscious library workers to consider how our relationships to policing and security in the library affect all peoples. To do so, we draw on an intersectional abolitionist praxis that seeks to deconstruct the carceral and penal systems omnipresent in our society. After exploring some of the security measures taken by public libraries that enable the carceral state, we propose alternative measures that can be taken through the acronym-based catchphrase to encourage library workers of all types to give greater consideration to the ramifications of involving police in difficult patron interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathfinder A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/pathfinder100
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policing and Carcerality in Public Libraries

Sean Gleason, Ash Ridsdale, Monica Maddaford, Alyssa De'Ath
Pathfinder A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals
Library Science and Administration
article

Policing and Carcerality in Public Libraries

Sean Gleason, Ash Ridsdale, Monica Maddaford, Alyssa De'Ath
article en

Abstract

Policing in libraries poses a significant barrier to access for many potential patrons—and yet, much of the literature on library security advocates for strong security measures without regard for the safety and wellbeing of patrons and staff who are BIPOC, LGBTQ2SIA+, disabled, and unhoused. Considerable lived experience and research shows that police disproportionately target those whose identities deviate from the norm, but in a society with so many diverse experiences, identities, and relationships to power and authority, we are obligated as socially conscious library workers to consider how our relationships to policing and security in the library affect all peoples. To do so, we draw on an intersectional abolitionist praxis that seeks to deconstruct the carceral and penal systems omnipresent in our society. After exploring some of the security measures taken by public libraries that enable the carceral state, we propose alternative measures that can be taken through the acronym-based catchphrase to encourage library workers of all types to give greater consideration to the ramifications of involving police in difficult patron interactions.

Pathfinder A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career ProfessionalsVol. 5(1)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Library Science and Administration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policing and Carcerality in Public Libraries — Sean Gleason, Ash Ridsdale, et al. · Pathfinder A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS