The future of EPCs: Data, policy, and public perception in the race for energy efficiency

• The interviews indicate that the public has a limited understanding of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and does not fully recognize their economic and energy-saving benefits. • Stakeholders emphasize the need to ensure the quality of EPC data, improve user accessibility, and include indicators that allow for a more accurate assessment. • Vulnerable populations may face exclusion due to the high costs associated with building renovations required to improve EPC ratings, potentially exacerbating energy poverty. • Aligning technical improvements in EPCs with public understanding can support more effective adoption and have a greater impact on reducing energy consumption and emissions. Amidst the pressing concern about climate change, the construction sector has been identified as one of the main energy consumers in Europe, which also positions it as one of the sectors with the greatest potential for efficiency improvements. In response to this, the European Union established the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) system, with the aim of boosting transparency and encouraging sustainable renovations. However, the results have not been as expected. Some of the causes of this are poor data quality, limited public awareness and inadequate legislation, which together undermine trust in the certification process. In addition, concerns about the possible exclusion of low-income households have sparked debates about the financial burdens and possible rent increases following energy efficiency improvements. This article presents insights from a qualitative study of various stakeholders, including public agencies, technical experts and real estate professionals, examining prevailing perceptions of EPC design, implementation and utility. Key findings reveal that mandatory policies drive adoption, but administrative complexities and inconsistent metrics erode public trust. Furthermore, the gap between specialist and non-specialist audiences prevents the certificate from playing a role in motivating behaviour change. The new version of the European Commission's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) introduces standardised templates and databases. Added to this, stakeholder feedback highlights the need for public education, accurate energy data and tailored financial mechanisms. This study concludes that to refine EPC policies, integrated and holistic frameworks are needed that address socio-economic risks, foster equity and accelerate Europe's transition to low-carbon housing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Governance
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.02.006
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The future of EPCs: Data, policy, and public perception in the race for energy efficiency

Nuno Alexandre Cruz, Mugarra Aitziber, Ferrón Leandro, Soimu Oxana
4 citations
Urban Governance
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
4.03
article

The future of EPCs: Data, policy, and public perception in the race for energy efficiency

Nuno Alexandre Cruz, Mugarra Aitziber, Ferrón Leandro, Soimu Oxana
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• The interviews indicate that the public has a limited understanding of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and does not fully recognize their economic and energy-saving benefits. • Stakeholders emphasize the need to ensure the quality of EPC data, improve user accessibility, and include indicators that allow for a more accurate assessment. • Vulnerable populations may face exclusion due to the high costs associated with building renovations required to improve EPC ratings, potentially exacerbating energy poverty. • Aligning technical improvements in EPCs with public understanding can support more effective adoption and have a greater impact on reducing energy consumption and emissions. Amidst the pressing concern about climate change, the construction sector has been identified as one of the main energy consumers in Europe, which also positions it as one of the sectors with the greatest potential for efficiency improvements. In response to this, the European Union established the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) system, with the aim of boosting transparency and encouraging sustainable renovations. However, the results have not been as expected. Some of the causes of this are poor data quality, limited public awareness and inadequate legislation, which together undermine trust in the certification process. In addition, concerns about the possible exclusion of low-income households have sparked debates about the financial burdens and possible rent increases following energy efficiency improvements. This article presents insights from a qualitative study of various stakeholders, including public agencies, technical experts and real estate professionals, examining prevailing perceptions of EPC design, implementation and utility. Key findings reveal that mandatory policies drive adoption, but administrative complexities and inconsistent metrics erode public trust. Furthermore, the gap between specialist and non-specialist audiences prevents the certificate from playing a role in motivating behaviour change. The new version of the European Commission's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) introduces standardised templates and databases. Added to this, stakeholder feedback highlights the need for public education, accurate energy data and tailored financial mechanisms. This study concludes that to refine EPC policies, integrated and holistic frameworks are needed that address socio-economic risks, foster equity and accelerate Europe's transition to low-carbon housing.

Urban GovernanceVol. 5(1)
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Horizon 2020
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.