Quality of YouTube videos on focused assessment with sonography in trauma protocol

Objective: The Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) protocol is one of the most critical steps in trauma assessment in current emergency department practices. The contribution of video-based learning to medical education is increasingly recognized. This study aims to evaluate the quality of videos related to e-FAST ultrasonography as well as the factors influencing video quality. Methods: The study encompassed conducting searches on YouTube using the keywords "FAST," "E-FAST," and "Trauma USG," followed by a comprehensive analysis of the retrieved videos. The quality of these videos was evaluated using JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN scores. Results: The study included 93 videos. The mean mDISCERN score was 3.1 (0.9), the mean JAMA score was 2.1 (0.7), and the mean GQS score was 3.4 (1.0). Sixty-five (69.9%) of the videos were recorded by individuals, and 60 (64.5%) used only the US image in the video. The median video length was 639 seconds (s) (range: 250–1305 s), median number of comments was 0 (range 0–4), median upload date (days) was 1675 (range: 976-2750), number of views was 2250 (range: 467-14187), and number of likes was 28 (range: 8-162). The mean mDISCERN and JAMA scores of institutional videos were 3.2 (0.9) and 2.2 (0.7), respectively, and the mean mDISCERN and JAMA scores of individual videos were 2.7 (0.8) and 1.9 (0.7) (P values = 0.008 and 0.018, respectively). The mean GQS score of institutional videos was 3.5 (0.1), and the mean GQS score of individual videos was 3.3 (0.8) (P=0.325). The median number of comments in individual videos was 4.0 (range: 0.0–12.5), while the median number of comments in institutional videos was 0.0 (range: 0.0–2.0; P= 0.011). There is a significant difference in the number of likes (P=0.043). No significant difference was found in video length, date, and number of views between individual and institutional videos (P values = 0.236, 0.974, and 0.255, respectively). Conclusion: Upon reviewing e-FAST/FAST protocol videos on social networks, it becomes apparent that institutional videos exhibit better quality. Institutional videos are not only more target-oriented, but they also provide reliable information and are optimized for timeliness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Emergency Medicine
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/fem.v9i1.18068
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of YouTube videos on focused assessment with sonography in trauma protocol

Bora Çekmen, Şeref Emre Atış, Büşra Bildik, Erinc BARCIN et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Emergency Medicine
Social Media in Health Education
2.17
article

Quality of YouTube videos on focused assessment with sonography in trauma protocol

Bora Çekmen, Şeref Emre Atış, Büşra Bildik, Erinc BARCIN, Cemre AKDOGAN, Lutfi Anıl GUDEK, Besir CAYLI
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: The Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) protocol is one of the most critical steps in trauma assessment in current emergency department practices. The contribution of video-based learning to medical education is increasingly recognized. This study aims to evaluate the quality of videos related to e-FAST ultrasonography as well as the factors influencing video quality. Methods: The study encompassed conducting searches on YouTube using the keywords "FAST," "E-FAST," and "Trauma USG," followed by a comprehensive analysis of the retrieved videos. The quality of these videos was evaluated using JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN scores. Results: The study included 93 videos. The mean mDISCERN score was 3.1 (0.9), the mean JAMA score was 2.1 (0.7), and the mean GQS score was 3.4 (1.0). Sixty-five (69.9%) of the videos were recorded by individuals, and 60 (64.5%) used only the US image in the video. The median video length was 639 seconds (s) (range: 250–1305 s), median number of comments was 0 (range 0–4), median upload date (days) was 1675 (range: 976-2750), number of views was 2250 (range: 467-14187), and number of likes was 28 (range: 8-162). The mean mDISCERN and JAMA scores of institutional videos were 3.2 (0.9) and 2.2 (0.7), respectively, and the mean mDISCERN and JAMA scores of individual videos were 2.7 (0.8) and 1.9 (0.7) (P values = 0.008 and 0.018, respectively). The mean GQS score of institutional videos was 3.5 (0.1), and the mean GQS score of individual videos was 3.3 (0.8) (P=0.325). The median number of comments in individual videos was 4.0 (range: 0.0–12.5), while the median number of comments in institutional videos was 0.0 (range: 0.0–2.0; P= 0.011). There is a significant difference in the number of likes (P=0.043). No significant difference was found in video length, date, and number of views between individual and institutional videos (P values = 0.236, 0.974, and 0.255, respectively). Conclusion: Upon reviewing e-FAST/FAST protocol videos on social networks, it becomes apparent that institutional videos exhibit better quality. Institutional videos are not only more target-oriented, but they also provide reliable information and are optimized for timeliness.

Frontiers in Emergency Medicine
Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Karabük University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Social Media in Health Education
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.