Magnetisation loss behaviour in insulated and non-insulated HTS REBCO double-pancake and racetrack coils at 77 K

Abstract In many high-temperature superconducting applications, the advantages of no-insulation (NI) coils, such as self-protecting capability and thermal stability, make them a promising alternative to insulated (INS) coils. Magnetisation loss will be generated when the coil is exposed to time-varying magnetic fields. This loss can vary with the applied field angle, magnitude, and frequency, resulting in parasitic heat loads. In this study, we investigate magnetization loss in NI and INS double-pancake and double-racetrack coils of identical dimensions, experimentally and numerically. Experiments were conducted at 77 K under external AC magnetic fields up to 100 mT, considering various field angles (0°–90°) and frequencies (73–146 Hz). The experimental results are compared with the finite element simulation results of the coils’ three-dimensional models. Interestingly, NI coils exhibit no significant angular dependence of loss within a specific field range; however, beyond this range loss increases with increasing field angles. In contrast, the loss in INS coils consistently increases with decreasing field angles across the entire field range. Coil level shielding of the magnetic field is observed in NI coils under parallel fields which is similar to a bulk superconductor. The losses in INS and NI coils are comparable under a perpendicular magnetic field, which can be attributed to the dominance of superconducting currents, as confirmed by the current and field distributions observed in simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Superconductor Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/adbce2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetisation loss behaviour in insulated and non-insulated HTS REBCO double-pancake and racetrack coils at 77 K

Zhenan Jiang, Rodney A. Badcock, Mark Ainslie, Ben George Koshy et al.
4 citations
Superconductor Science and Technology
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
5.03
article

Magnetisation loss behaviour in insulated and non-insulated HTS REBCO double-pancake and racetrack coils at 77 K

Zhenan Jiang, Rodney A. Badcock, Mark Ainslie, Ben George Koshy, B. P. P. Mallett, Yueming Sun, Konstantinos Bouloukakis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In many high-temperature superconducting applications, the advantages of no-insulation (NI) coils, such as self-protecting capability and thermal stability, make them a promising alternative to insulated (INS) coils. Magnetisation loss will be generated when the coil is exposed to time-varying magnetic fields. This loss can vary with the applied field angle, magnitude, and frequency, resulting in parasitic heat loads. In this study, we investigate magnetization loss in NI and INS double-pancake and double-racetrack coils of identical dimensions, experimentally and numerically. Experiments were conducted at 77 K under external AC magnetic fields up to 100 mT, considering various field angles (0°–90°) and frequencies (73–146 Hz). The experimental results are compared with the finite element simulation results of the coils’ three-dimensional models. Interestingly, NI coils exhibit no significant angular dependence of loss within a specific field range; however, beyond this range loss increases with increasing field angles. In contrast, the loss in INS coils consistently increases with decreasing field angles across the entire field range. Coil level shielding of the magnetic field is observed in NI coils under parallel fields which is similar to a bulk superconductor. The losses in INS and NI coils are comparable under a perpendicular magnetic field, which can be attributed to the dominance of superconducting currents, as confirmed by the current and field distributions observed in simulations.

Superconductor Science and TechnologyVol. 38(4)
King's College London (GB), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology (NZ)
Victoria University of Wellington
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.