Comparative analysis of Feedlot and Free-range cattle management on Botswana beef quality: a study of sustainability, post-mortem examination, and SWOT analysis

African agriculture faces triple threats of climate change, population growth and inequality, necessitating sustainability research in agriculture that comprehensively examines social, economic, environmental, and socio-political trade-offs. To examine sustainable beef production in Botswana, this study used a mixed-method approach to explore Feedlot and Free-range cattle management systems. First, competing but overlapping factors of environmental, economic, and social sustainability in beef production were identified from literature review, and a conceptual framework for sustainability was used to assess the trade-offs inherent in both management systems. Second, abattoir post-mortem examinations were used to compare 25 feedlot cattle and 22 free-range cattle across standard factors including: carcass dress mass (CDM), carcass grade, fat colour, conformation, dentition, carcass and offal postmortem decisions, and reasons for the decisions. Lastly, sustainability trade-offs for feedlot and free-range cattle management were compared through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. Sustainability assessment showed that feedlots rely on imported grains like corn and soybean, increasing producers' uncertainty as an increasingly turbulent world affects grains availability and pricing. Free-range pasture systems, on the other hand, rely on rainfed agriculture (and often communal lands), which are increasingly challenged by the intersections of climate change, overgrazing and issues of land access. Feedlot animals had a significantly higher CDM (p = 0.0001) at 237.56 kg ± 6.98 (Mean ± SEM) compared to 184.50 kg ± 7.44 for Free-range cattle and higher incidences of red offal condemnation rates (lung, liver, and spleen) (p < 0.05) compared to free-range cattle. Free-range cattle had higher green offal condemnation rates specifically large tripe (p = 0.026) compared to feedlot cattle. SWOT analysis confirmed the trade-offs in several factors including carcass weight, feed costs, and climate change impacts. The conceptual framework for sustainability, postmortem findings and SWOT analysis reveal cattle farming challenges and trade-offs that must be made to address disease burdens, animal nutrition, and productivity in Botswana.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical Animal Health and Production
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04355-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of Feedlot and Free-range cattle management on Botswana beef quality: a study of sustainability, post-mortem examination, and SWOT analysis

Brianna Parsons, Solomon S. Ramabu, Joshuah Makore, Boisy Motube et al.
3 citations
Tropical Animal Health and Production
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
7.27
article

Comparative analysis of Feedlot and Free-range cattle management on Botswana beef quality: a study of sustainability, post-mortem examination, and SWOT analysis

Brianna Parsons, Solomon S. Ramabu, Joshuah Makore, Boisy Motube, Gregory Thato Rakobe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

African agriculture faces triple threats of climate change, population growth and inequality, necessitating sustainability research in agriculture that comprehensively examines social, economic, environmental, and socio-political trade-offs. To examine sustainable beef production in Botswana, this study used a mixed-method approach to explore Feedlot and Free-range cattle management systems. First, competing but overlapping factors of environmental, economic, and social sustainability in beef production were identified from literature review, and a conceptual framework for sustainability was used to assess the trade-offs inherent in both management systems. Second, abattoir post-mortem examinations were used to compare 25 feedlot cattle and 22 free-range cattle across standard factors including: carcass dress mass (CDM), carcass grade, fat colour, conformation, dentition, carcass and offal postmortem decisions, and reasons for the decisions. Lastly, sustainability trade-offs for feedlot and free-range cattle management were compared through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. Sustainability assessment showed that feedlots rely on imported grains like corn and soybean, increasing producers' uncertainty as an increasingly turbulent world affects grains availability and pricing. Free-range pasture systems, on the other hand, rely on rainfed agriculture (and often communal lands), which are increasingly challenged by the intersections of climate change, overgrazing and issues of land access. Feedlot animals had a significantly higher CDM (p = 0.0001) at 237.56 kg ± 6.98 (Mean ± SEM) compared to 184.50 kg ± 7.44 for Free-range cattle and higher incidences of red offal condemnation rates (lung, liver, and spleen) (p < 0.05) compared to free-range cattle. Free-range cattle had higher green offal condemnation rates specifically large tripe (p = 0.026) compared to feedlot cattle. SWOT analysis confirmed the trade-offs in several factors including carcass weight, feed costs, and climate change impacts. The conceptual framework for sustainability, postmortem findings and SWOT analysis reveal cattle farming challenges and trade-offs that must be made to address disease burdens, animal nutrition, and productivity in Botswana.

Tropical Animal Health and ProductionVol. 57(2)
University of Botswana (BW), University of the Gambia (GM), Genesis HealthCare (US), Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (BW), University of Pennsylvania (US)
University of Pennsylvania
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.