Mathematical literacy and learning style: An analysis of students’ PISA performance using Kolb’s framework

This study aimed to investigate the mathematical literacy of Grade VIII junior high school students based on their learning styles, as categorized by David Kolb. A qualitative approach with a descriptive research design was employed. The sample consisted of eight students, with two students representing each of the four learning styles: accommodating, assimilating, converging, and diverging. Data were collected through questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The research instruments included the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI), a mathematical literacy ability test, and an interview guide. Data analysis involved data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results revealed that students with accommodating and assimilating learning styles demonstrated proficiency in all three mathematical literacy indicators—formulate, employ, and interpret/evaluate—whereas students with a converging learning style met only two indicators (formulate and employ). In contrast, students with a diverging learning style fulfilled only one indicator (formulate). These findings suggest that students with accommodating and assimilating learning styles exhibited superior mathematical literacy skills compared to those with converging and diverging learning styles. This study contributes to the understanding of how different learning styles influence students' mathematical literacy and provides insights for educators to develop more effective teaching strategies tailored to diverse learning preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v13i1.19101
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical literacy and learning style: An analysis of students’ PISA performance using Kolb’s framework

Nur Asma Riani Siregar, Mariyanti Elvi, Suci Putri
UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Mathematical literacy and learning style: An analysis of students’ PISA performance using Kolb’s framework

Nur Asma Riani Siregar, Mariyanti Elvi, Suci Putri
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the mathematical literacy of Grade VIII junior high school students based on their learning styles, as categorized by David Kolb. A qualitative approach with a descriptive research design was employed. The sample consisted of eight students, with two students representing each of the four learning styles: accommodating, assimilating, converging, and diverging. Data were collected through questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The research instruments included the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI), a mathematical literacy ability test, and an interview guide. Data analysis involved data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results revealed that students with accommodating and assimilating learning styles demonstrated proficiency in all three mathematical literacy indicators—formulate, employ, and interpret/evaluate—whereas students with a converging learning style met only two indicators (formulate and employ). In contrast, students with a diverging learning style fulfilled only one indicator (formulate). These findings suggest that students with accommodating and assimilating learning styles exhibited superior mathematical literacy skills compared to those with converging and diverging learning styles. This study contributes to the understanding of how different learning styles influence students' mathematical literacy and provides insights for educators to develop more effective teaching strategies tailored to diverse learning preferences.

UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MatematikaVol. 13(1)
Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.