Analysis of conjecture ability from the perspective of learning styles

This study investigates students' ability to make conjectures based on their preferred learning styles. A qualitative descriptive research methodology was applied. The participants consisted of ten mathematics majors enrolled in the 2024–2025 academic year. Researchers employed a purposive sampling strategy to select the subjects. The test questions and learning style surveys used in the assessment tool were reviewed and approved by expert educators. Data from the test and the learning style questionnaire were analyzed to determine students' learning styles and their ability to formulate conjectures. The results indicate that visual learners demonstrated the highest ability to make conjectures, as they tend to perceive mathematical concepts visually before solving problems. In contrast, students with auditory or kinesthetic learning styles exhibited lower conjecture-making abilities, primarily due to memory-related challenges. However, students with these learning styles can still improve their conjecture skills with appropriate instructional approaches. Enhancing students' ability to formulate conjectures enables them to better explain mathematical concepts, derive information from mathematical problems, anticipate outcomes, develop solutions, and construct well-founded arguments. This study contributes to the field of mathematics education by providing insights into how different learning styles influence students' conjecture-making abilities, which can inform the development of more effective teaching strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v13i1.18880
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of conjecture ability from the perspective of learning styles

Robisha Zarifa Ribaah, Ahmad Sofi Yullah, M Rahma
UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Analysis of conjecture ability from the perspective of learning styles

Robisha Zarifa Ribaah, Ahmad Sofi Yullah, M Rahma
article en

Abstract

This study investigates students' ability to make conjectures based on their preferred learning styles. A qualitative descriptive research methodology was applied. The participants consisted of ten mathematics majors enrolled in the 2024–2025 academic year. Researchers employed a purposive sampling strategy to select the subjects. The test questions and learning style surveys used in the assessment tool were reviewed and approved by expert educators. Data from the test and the learning style questionnaire were analyzed to determine students' learning styles and their ability to formulate conjectures. The results indicate that visual learners demonstrated the highest ability to make conjectures, as they tend to perceive mathematical concepts visually before solving problems. In contrast, students with auditory or kinesthetic learning styles exhibited lower conjecture-making abilities, primarily due to memory-related challenges. However, students with these learning styles can still improve their conjecture skills with appropriate instructional approaches. Enhancing students' ability to formulate conjectures enables them to better explain mathematical concepts, derive information from mathematical problems, anticipate outcomes, develop solutions, and construct well-founded arguments. This study contributes to the field of mathematics education by providing insights into how different learning styles influence students' conjecture-making abilities, which can inform the development of more effective teaching strategies.

UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MatematikaVol. 13(1)
Syndicat des Sélectionneurs Avicoles et Aquacoles Français (FR), Universitas Ibrahimy (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.