Dietary dilemmas: Navigating trade-offs in food choice for sustainability, health, naturalness, and price

The global discourse surrounding the food system has intensified, driven by the recognition that dietary choices play a pivotal role in achieving environmental sustainability objectives and shaping collective health patterns. Our study investigates the influence of sustainability, healthiness, naturalness, and price on consumer preferences, with the objective of determining which of these attributes may drive a shift in choices. A survey, including a Discrete Choice Experiment focussed on yoghurt, was conducted on a sample of 622 Italian and Danish consumers. The data were subjected to latent class analysis. The findings underscore the complexity of consumer decision-making. Notably, 48 % of the sample weighed sustainability, healthiness, and naturalness in their choices without making trade-offs between these attributes. In contrast, 10 % prioritised health over sustainability and naturalness, thereby demonstrating the existence of a trade-off. The remaining consumers based their decision solely on the price. The differences observed between Denmark and Italy are linked to price sensitivity. The discussion offers insights for developing strategies to promote both health and sustainability in the food market. • Choices align with the characteristics of the habitual product, even when it is unavailable. • 42 % of the sample chooses based only on price, ignoring sustainability, naturalness, and health. • 48 % of the sample value sustainability, naturalness, and health without a trade-off. • Health-driven consumers (10 %) trade-off sustainability and naturalness for health benefits. • When sustainability is prioritised, no conflict with personal health emerges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105497
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dietary dilemmas: Navigating trade-offs in food choice for sustainability, health, naturalness, and price

Tommaso Fantechi, Leonardo Casini, Caterina Contini, Liisa Lähteenmäki
4 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
article

Dietary dilemmas: Navigating trade-offs in food choice for sustainability, health, naturalness, and price

Tommaso Fantechi, Leonardo Casini, Caterina Contini, Liisa Lähteenmäki
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The global discourse surrounding the food system has intensified, driven by the recognition that dietary choices play a pivotal role in achieving environmental sustainability objectives and shaping collective health patterns. Our study investigates the influence of sustainability, healthiness, naturalness, and price on consumer preferences, with the objective of determining which of these attributes may drive a shift in choices. A survey, including a Discrete Choice Experiment focussed on yoghurt, was conducted on a sample of 622 Italian and Danish consumers. The data were subjected to latent class analysis. The findings underscore the complexity of consumer decision-making. Notably, 48 % of the sample weighed sustainability, healthiness, and naturalness in their choices without making trade-offs between these attributes. In contrast, 10 % prioritised health over sustainability and naturalness, thereby demonstrating the existence of a trade-off. The remaining consumers based their decision solely on the price. The differences observed between Denmark and Italy are linked to price sensitivity. The discussion offers insights for developing strategies to promote both health and sustainability in the food market. • Choices align with the characteristics of the habitual product, even when it is unavailable. • 42 % of the sample chooses based only on price, ignoring sustainability, naturalness, and health. • 48 % of the sample value sustainability, naturalness, and health without a trade-off. • Health-driven consumers (10 %) trade-off sustainability and naturalness for health benefits. • When sustainability is prioritised, no conflict with personal health emerges.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 129
Aarhus University (DK), University of Florence (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.