Religious and Social Conceptions of Divorce: A Case Study of Cibogo Community in Cirebon

Marriage is seen as a social institution that legally binds two individuals, while divorce marks the legal and social end of that relationship. The complexity of marriage involves cultural, religious, and social factors, and family issues often lead to divorce. The aim of this study is to identify the causes and impacts of divorce. Using a case study approach and qualitative research methods, the study employs conflict theory as its theoretical framework. Conflict theory emphasizes how social, economic, and political factors influence marital dynamics, ultimately contributing to the likelihood of divorce. Marital conflicts can arise from an unequal division of household labor, differences in opinion, or infidelity, often triggered by emotional tension or unmet needs. External factors, such as financial difficulties, unemployment, or cultural differences, can further strain the relationship. Divorce is often seen as a response to perceived injustice within the marriage. If one partner feels exploited or if there is an imbalance of power, divorce may become a means of seeking justice. Conflict theory provides insights into how these social, economic, and political factors shape marital relationships, helping individuals understand the underlying causes of marital conflicts and the potential for divorce.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religion and Social Transformation
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24235/mb1q0x44
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religious and Social Conceptions of Divorce: A Case Study of Cibogo Community in Cirebon

Shabrina Riana, Rizky Hadi Purnama, Tasya Diana Amalia, Himawan et al.
1 links
Journal of Religion and Social Transformation
Gender and Women's Rights
article

Religious and Social Conceptions of Divorce: A Case Study of Cibogo Community in Cirebon

Shabrina Riana, Rizky Hadi Purnama, Tasya Diana Amalia, Himawan, Nurlaili Khikmawati, Rizkia Fatur Rochma
article en

Abstract

Marriage is seen as a social institution that legally binds two individuals, while divorce marks the legal and social end of that relationship. The complexity of marriage involves cultural, religious, and social factors, and family issues often lead to divorce. The aim of this study is to identify the causes and impacts of divorce. Using a case study approach and qualitative research methods, the study employs conflict theory as its theoretical framework. Conflict theory emphasizes how social, economic, and political factors influence marital dynamics, ultimately contributing to the likelihood of divorce. Marital conflicts can arise from an unequal division of household labor, differences in opinion, or infidelity, often triggered by emotional tension or unmet needs. External factors, such as financial difficulties, unemployment, or cultural differences, can further strain the relationship. Divorce is often seen as a response to perceived injustice within the marriage. If one partner feels exploited or if there is an imbalance of power, divorce may become a means of seeking justice. Conflict theory provides insights into how these social, economic, and political factors shape marital relationships, helping individuals understand the underlying causes of marital conflicts and the potential for divorce.

Journal of Religion and Social TransformationVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Gender and Women's Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.