Arguing for False Moral Dilemmas in Games

How can single-player video games morally engage their audience? Role-playing games with moral systems have been especially criticized for neutralizing moral engagement, while now classics such as Papers, Please (Pope 2013), Spec Ops: The Line (Yäger 2013), and The Walking Dead (Telltale 2012) have received much praise for fostering it. This is because moral engagement has been mostly modelled on the characteristics of true moral dilemmas, which prevent the player from adopting an "instrumental perspective" (Staines et al. 2019). This paper problematizes the true moral dilemma model by revisiting morally engaging games Papers, Please and The Walking Dead. Thanks to a virtue ethics perspective, it defends the value of false, biased, and irresolvable dilemmas that exercise the player's ways of being in the face of difficult circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26503/dl.v2024i1.2216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arguing for False Moral Dilemmas in Games

Maxime Deslongchamps-Gagnon
1 citations
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.34
article

Arguing for False Moral Dilemmas in Games

Maxime Deslongchamps-Gagnon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How can single-player video games morally engage their audience? Role-playing games with moral systems have been especially criticized for neutralizing moral engagement, while now classics such as Papers, Please (Pope 2013), Spec Ops: The Line (Yäger 2013), and The Walking Dead (Telltale 2012) have received much praise for fostering it. This is because moral engagement has been mostly modelled on the characteristics of true moral dilemmas, which prevent the player from adopting an "instrumental perspective" (Staines et al. 2019). This paper problematizes the true moral dilemma model by revisiting morally engaging games Papers, Please and The Walking Dead. Thanks to a virtue ethics perspective, it defends the value of false, biased, and irresolvable dilemmas that exercise the player's ways of being in the face of difficult circumstances.

Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.