Automating the Comparison of Learning Design and Delivery Using Course Scaffolding in Moodle

Learning analytics from an LMS combined with design analytics from a learning design (LD) tool provide a foundation for checking the alignment of a course's LD and its delivery. For students to achieve the intended learning outcomes, a theoretically founded and innovative LD is essential. The next step is the orchestration of course delivery according to the prepared LD; however, due to real-life circumstances, delivery can deviate from the plan. Therefore, it is important to compare LD and delivery, identify potential differences, justify them, or redesign the course. In this comparison process, it is necessary to evaluate constructive alignment and assessment validity. These processes are described in the paper, along with their automation using the Balanced Design Planning (BDP) concept and tool for LD. The most significant achievement in this direction is the automatic scaffolding of a course in the open LMS Moodle directly from the BDP LD tool. This scaffolding functionality forms the basis for the development of an algorithm for the comparison of course LD and delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/informatics62280.2024.10900846
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating the Comparison of Learning Design and Delivery Using Course Scaffolding in Moodle

Petra Vondra, Blaženka Divjak, Darko Grabar, Barbi Svetec
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Automating the Comparison of Learning Design and Delivery Using Course Scaffolding in Moodle

Petra Vondra, Blaženka Divjak, Darko Grabar, Barbi Svetec
article en

Abstract

Learning analytics from an LMS combined with design analytics from a learning design (LD) tool provide a foundation for checking the alignment of a course's LD and its delivery. For students to achieve the intended learning outcomes, a theoretically founded and innovative LD is essential. The next step is the orchestration of course delivery according to the prepared LD; however, due to real-life circumstances, delivery can deviate from the plan. Therefore, it is important to compare LD and delivery, identify potential differences, justify them, or redesign the course. In this comparison process, it is necessary to evaluate constructive alignment and assessment validity. These processes are described in the paper, along with their automation using the Balanced Design Planning (BDP) concept and tool for LD. The most significant achievement in this direction is the automatic scaffolding of a course in the open LMS Moodle directly from the BDP LD tool. This scaffolding functionality forms the basis for the development of an algorithm for the comparison of course LD and delivery.

University of Zagreb (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automating the Comparison of Learning Design and Delivery Using Course Scaffolding in Moodle — Petra Vondra, Blaženka Divjak, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS