Detection and Tracking of Nile Tilapia Using DeepLabCut with ResNet50 and MobileNetV2

Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is vital for aquaculture due to its rapid growth and high productivity. This study tackles detection and tracking concerns using machine vision techniques, developing an automated system with DeepLabCut™ and training classifiers with ResNet50 and MobileNet V2-1.0. MobileNet V2 showed balanced performance, with lower training (634.5 pixels) and test errors (723.7 pixels), and a higher mean likelihood (0.60) for the body region. ResNet50, despite efficient learning, suffered from overfitting, with training and test errors of 1121.2 and 1083.3 pixels, and low mean likelihood (0.1) for all body parts. These results indicate MobileNet V2 is better for reliable, resource-efficient predictions, while ResNet50 could improve with better data quality and annotations. Future research should focus on enhancing data quality, extended training, and advanced regularization techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tencon61640.2024.10902932
Primary Topic
Identification and Quantification in Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection and Tracking of Nile Tilapia Using DeepLabCut with ResNet50 and MobileNetV2

Robert G. de Luna, Marife A. Rosales, Braulio M. Valencia, John Alfred M. Pagarigan et al.
Identification and Quantification in Food
article

Detection and Tracking of Nile Tilapia Using DeepLabCut with ResNet50 and MobileNetV2

Robert G. de Luna, Marife A. Rosales, Braulio M. Valencia, John Alfred M. Pagarigan, Danielle A. Eleuterio
article en

Abstract

Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is vital for aquaculture due to its rapid growth and high productivity. This study tackles detection and tracking concerns using machine vision techniques, developing an automated system with DeepLabCut™ and training classifiers with ResNet50 and MobileNet V2-1.0. MobileNet V2 showed balanced performance, with lower training (634.5 pixels) and test errors (723.7 pixels), and a higher mean likelihood (0.60) for the body region. ResNet50, despite efficient learning, suffered from overfitting, with training and test errors of 1121.2 and 1083.3 pixels, and low mean likelihood (0.1) for all body parts. These results indicate MobileNet V2 is better for reliable, resource-efficient predictions, while ResNet50 could improve with better data quality and annotations. Future research should focus on enhancing data quality, extended training, and advanced regularization techniques.

Polytechnic University of the Philippines (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Identification and Quantification in Food
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detection and Tracking of Nile Tilapia Using DeepLabCut with ResNet50 and MobileNetV2 — Robert G. de Luna, Marife A. Rosales, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS