Public sector open source software projects - How is development organized?

Abstract Context The adoption of Open Source Software (OSS) in Public Sector Organizations (PSOs) is on the rise, driven by benefits such as enhanced interoperability and transparency. However, PSOs encounter challenges stemming from limited technical capabilities and regulatory constraints in public procurement. Objective This study, based on a registered report, explores the organizational aspects of development in public sector OSS projects, i.e., projects initiated, developed, and governed by PSOs. We conjecture that the development diverges significantly from the commonly adopted bazaar model, wherein development is carried out collaboratively within a broader community. Method A purposefully sampled set of six public sector OSS projects was investigated using mixed-methods and compared with previously reported cases of bazaar OSS projects. Results Among the cases, we note that most (80%) of development efforts typically involve a small group of developers (<15) and rely on formalised processes. Developers are commonly procured from national and local service suppliers. Projects are planned top-down by involved PSOs with funding and contributions to development enabled through centralized or decentralized sponsorship. Projects with a centralized sponsorship have one or a few main PSOs funding the major part of the development. Decentralized sponsorship implies multiple PSOs being mutually dependent on each other to pool the necessary resources for the development. All OSS are reported as being of high quality despite limited size and contributions from their communities. Conclusions Findings suggest that public sector OSS projects deviate from the typical bazaar model, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to address challenges and solutions specific to their context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Software Engineering
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-025-10626-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public sector open source software projects - How is development organized?

Jonas Gamalielsson, Johan Linåker, Francisco Servant, Björn Lundell et al.
1 citations
Empirical Software Engineering
Open Source Software Innovations
1.69
article

Public sector open source software projects - How is development organized?

Jonas Gamalielsson, Johan Linåker, Francisco Servant, Björn Lundell, Sachiko Muto, Gregório Robles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Context The adoption of Open Source Software (OSS) in Public Sector Organizations (PSOs) is on the rise, driven by benefits such as enhanced interoperability and transparency. However, PSOs encounter challenges stemming from limited technical capabilities and regulatory constraints in public procurement. Objective This study, based on a registered report, explores the organizational aspects of development in public sector OSS projects, i.e., projects initiated, developed, and governed by PSOs. We conjecture that the development diverges significantly from the commonly adopted bazaar model, wherein development is carried out collaboratively within a broader community. Method A purposefully sampled set of six public sector OSS projects was investigated using mixed-methods and compared with previously reported cases of bazaar OSS projects. Results Among the cases, we note that most (80%) of development efforts typically involve a small group of developers (<15) and rely on formalised processes. Developers are commonly procured from national and local service suppliers. Projects are planned top-down by involved PSOs with funding and contributions to development enabled through centralized or decentralized sponsorship. Projects with a centralized sponsorship have one or a few main PSOs funding the major part of the development. Decentralized sponsorship implies multiple PSOs being mutually dependent on each other to pool the necessary resources for the development. All OSS are reported as being of high quality despite limited size and contributions from their communities. Conclusions Findings suggest that public sector OSS projects deviate from the typical bazaar model, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to address challenges and solutions specific to their context.

Empirical Software EngineeringVol. 30(3)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), University of Skövde (SE), RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
National Science Foundation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Open Source Software Innovations
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.