Performance of ambiguity-resolved detector for GNSS mixed-integer model

Teunissen (J Geod 98(83):1-16, 2024) proposed the ambiguity-resolved (AR) detection theory for GNSS mixed-integer model validation. In this contribution, we study the performance of the AR detector through analysis and simulation experiments and compare it with the ambiguity-float (AF) and ambiguity-known (AK) detectors. We describe how the detectors can be implemented and how to evaluate their performance by computing the power as functions of the model misspecifications' size. We present two simulation experiments with single- and dual-frequency GPS models and demonstrate that the AR detector can provide a larger detection power than the AF detector, even if the success rate is not close to one. Then, we obtain power functions over 25 user locations with five observation models and 72 satellite geometries per location per model. We find that the AR detector increases the detection probability of ionosphere and troposphere delays by 47% and 60% on average when the success rate is larger than 97.5% and the level of significance is 0.01. We also find the AR detection power to be larger than that of the AF detector in case of multi-dimensional misspecifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GPS Solutions
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01806-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of ambiguity-resolved detector for GNSS mixed-integer model

Christian Tiberius, Peter J. G. Teunissen, Chengyu Yin
3 citations
GPS Solutions
GNSS positioning and interference
14.98
article

Performance of ambiguity-resolved detector for GNSS mixed-integer model

Christian Tiberius, Peter J. G. Teunissen, Chengyu Yin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Teunissen (J Geod 98(83):1-16, 2024) proposed the ambiguity-resolved (AR) detection theory for GNSS mixed-integer model validation. In this contribution, we study the performance of the AR detector through analysis and simulation experiments and compare it with the ambiguity-float (AF) and ambiguity-known (AK) detectors. We describe how the detectors can be implemented and how to evaluate their performance by computing the power as functions of the model misspecifications' size. We present two simulation experiments with single- and dual-frequency GPS models and demonstrate that the AR detector can provide a larger detection power than the AF detector, even if the success rate is not close to one. Then, we obtain power functions over 25 user locations with five observation models and 72 satellite geometries per location per model. We find that the AR detector increases the detection probability of ionosphere and troposphere delays by 47% and 60% on average when the success rate is larger than 97.5% and the level of significance is 0.01. We also find the AR detection power to be larger than that of the AF detector in case of multi-dimensional misspecifications.

GPS SolutionsVol. 29(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Curtin University (AU), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Curtin University of Technology, Technische Universiteit Delft, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
GNSS positioning and interference
14.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.