Associations between love of life and affect

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the love of life associations with scales of positive affect (self-efficacy, life satisfaction, happiness, self-esteem, mental health, religiosity, well-being and optimism) and scales of negative affect (suicidality, obsession, pessimism, anxiety, neuroticism and depression). Design/methodology/approach A sample of Alexandria University undergraduates took part in the study (N = 480). They responded to the Love of Life (LOL) Scale as well as to 14 short scales of positive and negative affect. Findings Men obtained significantly higher mean total scores than did women for self-efficacy and well-being. Women had significantly higher mean total scores than did men for satisfaction, obsession, anxiety and neuroticism. Pearson correlations of love of life and positive affect scales were positive and higher than that with negative affect scales (negative). Principal components analysis extracted three components that were labeled as “positive affect” and “negative affect”, as well as a residual component. Regression analysis indicated that the predictors of love of life were satisfaction, lack of anxiety, mental health, lack of depression (men), optimism, lack of suicidality, happiness, religiosity, mental health and well-being (women). Research limitations/implications Love of life is associated more with positive affect scales than negative affect scales, indicating good convergent validity of the LOL Scale. Originality/value Love of life is considered as a good addition to the subjective well-being domain in positive psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-01-2025-0025
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between love of life and affect

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Associations between love of life and affect

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
article en

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the love of life associations with scales of positive affect (self-efficacy, life satisfaction, happiness, self-esteem, mental health, religiosity, well-being and optimism) and scales of negative affect (suicidality, obsession, pessimism, anxiety, neuroticism and depression). Design/methodology/approach A sample of Alexandria University undergraduates took part in the study (N = 480). They responded to the Love of Life (LOL) Scale as well as to 14 short scales of positive and negative affect. Findings Men obtained significantly higher mean total scores than did women for self-efficacy and well-being. Women had significantly higher mean total scores than did men for satisfaction, obsession, anxiety and neuroticism. Pearson correlations of love of life and positive affect scales were positive and higher than that with negative affect scales (negative). Principal components analysis extracted three components that were labeled as “positive affect” and “negative affect”, as well as a residual component. Regression analysis indicated that the predictors of love of life were satisfaction, lack of anxiety, mental health, lack of depression (men), optimism, lack of suicidality, happiness, religiosity, mental health and well-being (women). Research limitations/implications Love of life is associated more with positive affect scales than negative affect scales, indicating good convergent validity of the LOL Scale. Originality/value Love of life is considered as a good addition to the subjective well-being domain in positive psychology.

Mental Health and Social InclusionVol. 29(6)
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.