How Insider-Led Processes Lead to Localization: The Case of Digital Technology and Humanitarian Protection

Abstract The humanitarian sector has been increasingly concerned with localizing its activities—devolving capacity, power, and decision-making authority to the local communities and organizations that are the frequent recipients of its assistance. However, the mere “outsider-led” provision of assistance to local actors is not itself sufficient to empower them. Instead, we argue that “insider-led,” locally initiated processes can be an effective approach to localization. We identify how such shifts can occur and distinguish three different configurations of “insider-led” processes: Autonomous Adopters, Balanced Partners, and Exporting Entrepreneurs. We examine “insider-led” localization in the context of the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for civilian protection in humanitarian settings. The adoption of these technologies can generate localization if the structural power dynamics between global and local actors also shift to elevate locals. To illustrate these localization processes, we draw on original interviews and examples involving technology in the domain of civilian protection from the White Helmets in Syria and the Indigenous Guards in Colombia and Ecuador. The cases indicate that three conditions are important for the success of technology's ability to generate “insider-led” localization: a degree of pre-existing capacity, social capital among local actors innovating ICTs for protection, and ties to outsiders. Our accounting of the mechanisms of “insider-led” processes shows how future localization efforts can sustainably rebalance relationships between global humanitarians and local actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Studies Quarterly
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksaf018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Insider-Led Processes Lead to Localization: The Case of Digital Technology and Humanitarian Protection

Oliver Kaplan, Emily Paddon
2 citations
Global Studies Quarterly
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
1.56
article

How Insider-Led Processes Lead to Localization: The Case of Digital Technology and Humanitarian Protection

Oliver Kaplan, Emily Paddon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The humanitarian sector has been increasingly concerned with localizing its activities—devolving capacity, power, and decision-making authority to the local communities and organizations that are the frequent recipients of its assistance. However, the mere “outsider-led” provision of assistance to local actors is not itself sufficient to empower them. Instead, we argue that “insider-led,” locally initiated processes can be an effective approach to localization. We identify how such shifts can occur and distinguish three different configurations of “insider-led” processes: Autonomous Adopters, Balanced Partners, and Exporting Entrepreneurs. We examine “insider-led” localization in the context of the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for civilian protection in humanitarian settings. The adoption of these technologies can generate localization if the structural power dynamics between global and local actors also shift to elevate locals. To illustrate these localization processes, we draw on original interviews and examples involving technology in the domain of civilian protection from the White Helmets in Syria and the Indigenous Guards in Colombia and Ecuador. The cases indicate that three conditions are important for the success of technology's ability to generate “insider-led” localization: a degree of pre-existing capacity, social capital among local actors innovating ICTs for protection, and ties to outsiders. Our accounting of the mechanisms of “insider-led” processes shows how future localization efforts can sustainably rebalance relationships between global humanitarians and local actors.

Global Studies QuarterlyVol. 5(1)
Swarthmore College (US), University of Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.