¿Listening to science? A proposal of historical periodization of the problem of climate change communication

This article reviews the evolution of the problem of climate change science communication from 1988 to 2022 to determine the current state of the question and to identify the rhetorical approaches most widely used to date. Methodologically, a distinction is first drawn between institutional milestones and rhetorical moments in discourses originating in science, politics, and the arts/media. A general corpus of 13,794 documents, including scientific literature, journalistic sources, and official reports, is then reviewed. The result is a proposal for a historical periodization with three periods: from 1988 to 2009, characterized by pragmatic communication needs; from 2010 to 2015, when the need to communicate climate change as a social fact emerged; and from 2016 to 2022 when climate change began to elicit specific political action on the international stage. The results reveal evidence of rhetorical connections in the discourses used by the different actors involved in socially shaping public knowledge of climate change. As to the conclusions, it is essential to explore hybrid formulas of epistemic authority and to conduct further research on a dialogic model of science communication that does not overlook the need to “listen to science”, while also including the idea of a science that listens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Comunicación
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26441/rc24.1-2025-3723
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

¿Listening to science? A proposal of historical periodization of the problem of climate change communication

David Montero Sánchez, Concha Mateos Martín
Revista de Comunicación
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

¿Listening to science? A proposal of historical periodization of the problem of climate change communication

David Montero Sánchez, Concha Mateos Martín
article en

Abstract

This article reviews the evolution of the problem of climate change science communication from 1988 to 2022 to determine the current state of the question and to identify the rhetorical approaches most widely used to date. Methodologically, a distinction is first drawn between institutional milestones and rhetorical moments in discourses originating in science, politics, and the arts/media. A general corpus of 13,794 documents, including scientific literature, journalistic sources, and official reports, is then reviewed. The result is a proposal for a historical periodization with three periods: from 1988 to 2009, characterized by pragmatic communication needs; from 2010 to 2015, when the need to communicate climate change as a social fact emerged; and from 2016 to 2022 when climate change began to elicit specific political action on the international stage. The results reveal evidence of rhetorical connections in the discourses used by the different actors involved in socially shaping public knowledge of climate change. As to the conclusions, it is essential to explore hybrid formulas of epistemic authority and to conduct further research on a dialogic model of science communication that does not overlook the need to “listen to science”, while also including the idea of a science that listens.

Revista de ComunicaciónVol. 24(1)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.