A randomised comparative effectiveness trial exploring two lower-dose resistance training modalities on quality of life, functional capacity and strength in healthy, untrained community-dwelling older adults

This study investigated whether a lower volume of once-weekly resistance training (RT) could elicit meaningful improvements in quality of life (QoL), functional capacity and strength in untrained older adults, aiming to determine if reduced training volume could yield meaningful adaptations. The study included 31 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 66.7 ± 4.9 years; 55% female) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 kg/m². Participants were randomised into four groups to perform a leg press exercise using either maximal-intent (MI; defined as the purposeful intention to move as fast as possible regardless of resistance) or controlled-tempo (CT) RT across two volumes (3×5 or 5×5, sets × repetitions) at 60% one-repetition maximum (1RM) once weekly for six weeks. Body mass, BMI, QoL (assessed by the SF-36) were assessed, and a follow-up QoL survey conducted three months post-intervention. Functional capacity was evaluated using balance, six-minute walk (6MWT), timed-up-and-go (TUG), and 30-second sit-to-stand (30sSTS) tests. Strength was measured via leg press 1RM, knee extension maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC), and strength-to-mass ratio. All assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (week 3) and post-intervention (week 6) to compare the effectiveness of both shorter (3-week) and full-length (6-week) training periods. Low-dose RT significantly enhanced QoL, functional capacity, and strength (p < 0.05) across all groups within the first three weeks. Both CT and MI modalities led to significant strength improvements ( p < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between modalities ( p > 0.05). Despite the reduced volume, the 3×5 protocol achieved comparable outcomes to 5×5, suggesting that meaningful adaptations can be achieved with lower training volumes. These findings support the efficacy of short-term, lower-dose RT interventions for untrained older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Exercise and Health Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aehs.2025.03.001
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomised comparative effectiveness trial exploring two lower-dose resistance training modalities on quality of life, functional capacity and strength in healthy, untrained community-dwelling older adults

Stuart Goodall, Gill Barry, Liam T. Pearson, David Duffy et al.
Advanced Exercise and Health Science
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

A randomised comparative effectiveness trial exploring two lower-dose resistance training modalities on quality of life, functional capacity and strength in healthy, untrained community-dwelling older adults

Stuart Goodall, Gill Barry, Liam T. Pearson, David Duffy, David George Behm, Ashleigh Keenan, Samuel Stuart, Alena Pönitzová, Myles Stelling
article en

Abstract

This study investigated whether a lower volume of once-weekly resistance training (RT) could elicit meaningful improvements in quality of life (QoL), functional capacity and strength in untrained older adults, aiming to determine if reduced training volume could yield meaningful adaptations. The study included 31 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 66.7 ± 4.9 years; 55% female) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 kg/m². Participants were randomised into four groups to perform a leg press exercise using either maximal-intent (MI; defined as the purposeful intention to move as fast as possible regardless of resistance) or controlled-tempo (CT) RT across two volumes (3×5 or 5×5, sets × repetitions) at 60% one-repetition maximum (1RM) once weekly for six weeks. Body mass, BMI, QoL (assessed by the SF-36) were assessed, and a follow-up QoL survey conducted three months post-intervention. Functional capacity was evaluated using balance, six-minute walk (6MWT), timed-up-and-go (TUG), and 30-second sit-to-stand (30sSTS) tests. Strength was measured via leg press 1RM, knee extension maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC), and strength-to-mass ratio. All assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (week 3) and post-intervention (week 6) to compare the effectiveness of both shorter (3-week) and full-length (6-week) training periods. Low-dose RT significantly enhanced QoL, functional capacity, and strength (p < 0.05) across all groups within the first three weeks. Both CT and MI modalities led to significant strength improvements ( p < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference between modalities ( p > 0.05). Despite the reduced volume, the 3×5 protocol achieved comparable outcomes to 5×5, suggesting that meaningful adaptations can be achieved with lower training volumes. These findings support the efficacy of short-term, lower-dose RT interventions for untrained older adults.

Advanced Exercise and Health ScienceVol. 2(1)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Oregon Health & Science University (US), North-West University (ZA), Northumbria University (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.