Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria

For completing the energy transition, ordinary citizens have to be able to participate. This can be achieved with energy communities (ECs), which are getting implemented in EU member states. However, some of these legislations do not account for the possible challenges of implementing ECs. One example is Austrian law, which - in an attempt to take citizen involvement one step further - allows for simultaneous participation in multiple ECs. However, the law does not state how energy should be allocated among the members of these ECs, which opens the door to ambiguities that could lead to difficulties in energy allocation among ECs. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the study that closed this regulation gap by analyzing different methods of energy allocation in ECs with multiple participation. Four algorithms are developed and tested on solvability, complexity, comprehensibility, fairness and predictability. Only one algorithm has proven successful in all categories: the preference coefficient. Here, a preprocessing stage is included, in which each member must declare what percentage of consumption/generation goes to the multiple ECs in which they participate. Therefore, energy allocation in all ECs may be done in parallel without being dependent on the allocation results of other ECs. Based on the study presented this algorithm was implemented for the regulation of multiple participation in ECs in Austria. • Four algorithms for participation in multiple ECs are proposed. • Preference coefficient is the most suitable algorithm. • A complete lack of literature on EC multiple participation was detected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101672
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria

Thomas Klatzer, Sonja Wogrin, Lia Gruber
2 citations
Energy Strategy Reviews
Smart Grid Energy Management
1.46
article

Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria

Thomas Klatzer, Sonja Wogrin, Lia Gruber
article en
2 citations

Abstract

For completing the energy transition, ordinary citizens have to be able to participate. This can be achieved with energy communities (ECs), which are getting implemented in EU member states. However, some of these legislations do not account for the possible challenges of implementing ECs. One example is Austrian law, which - in an attempt to take citizen involvement one step further - allows for simultaneous participation in multiple ECs. However, the law does not state how energy should be allocated among the members of these ECs, which opens the door to ambiguities that could lead to difficulties in energy allocation among ECs. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the study that closed this regulation gap by analyzing different methods of energy allocation in ECs with multiple participation. Four algorithms are developed and tested on solvability, complexity, comprehensibility, fairness and predictability. Only one algorithm has proven successful in all categories: the preference coefficient. Here, a preprocessing stage is included, in which each member must declare what percentage of consumption/generation goes to the multiple ECs in which they participate. Therefore, energy allocation in all ECs may be done in parallel without being dependent on the allocation results of other ECs. Based on the study presented this algorithm was implemented for the regulation of multiple participation in ECs in Austria. • Four algorithms for participation in multiple ECs are proposed. • Preference coefficient is the most suitable algorithm. • A complete lack of literature on EC multiple participation was detected.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 58
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Smart Grid Energy Management
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing a regulatory framework for multiple participation in energy communities: Insights from Austria — Thomas Klatzer, Sonja Wogrin, et al. · Energy Strategy Reviews (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS