Benefit perceptions and their influence on the willingness to join community supported agriculture (CSA)

In this study, we focus on non-members’ benefit perception of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) and their willingness to join. We look into how information impacts the perception of CSA benefits, their relevance, and how these benefits and other factors such as trust levels, subjective knowledge, sustainable food shopping behaviour, political orientation and socio-demographics influence the willingness to join. We conducted an online between-subject experiment. Respondents (N=754) were divided in six groups, five groups were exposed to one benefit of CSA (i.e., either to the nutritional, sustainability, solidarity, transparency or community benefit) each, with the sixth group being the control group. Our experiment revealed that regardless of the information given, farmers were perceived to benefit the most from CSA, followed by society and lastly by the individual. However, all participants ranked individual benefits and environmental sustainability as the most important for them, followed by solidarity with farmers, transparency and community aspects. Moreover, the results show that the more beneficial CSAs are seen, the higher the willingness to join. While information on benefits such as solidarity with farmers, nutritional quality and community are effective in reaching young, educated and often female members, nutritional benefits are addressing environmentally conscious and conservative consumers. Overall, information on nutrition and environmental sustainability led to the highest wiliness to join. By communicating primarily about the nutritional benefit and environmental sustainability of CSAs, not only about altruistic benefits, a wider spread and integration of CSA could be achieved ultimately fostering a sustainable food production and consumption mindset. • Benefit Perceptions and their Influence on the Willingness to Join Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). – Highlights • Non-members prioritize individual benefits, despite perceiving CSA as farmer-focused. • Information boosted social and farmer benefit perceptions, but not individual ones. • Perceived overall CSA benefits are the strongest predictor of willingness to join. • Information on individual benefits, such as nutrition, can broaden the membership. • CSAs need to shift narratives, emphasizing individual benefits for broader appeal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100263
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefit perceptions and their influence on the willingness to join community supported agriculture (CSA)

Patrick Bottazzi, Rita Saleh, Stefan Galley
2 citations
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Organic Food and Agriculture
3.50
article

Benefit perceptions and their influence on the willingness to join community supported agriculture (CSA)

Patrick Bottazzi, Rita Saleh, Stefan Galley
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this study, we focus on non-members’ benefit perception of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) and their willingness to join. We look into how information impacts the perception of CSA benefits, their relevance, and how these benefits and other factors such as trust levels, subjective knowledge, sustainable food shopping behaviour, political orientation and socio-demographics influence the willingness to join. We conducted an online between-subject experiment. Respondents (N=754) were divided in six groups, five groups were exposed to one benefit of CSA (i.e., either to the nutritional, sustainability, solidarity, transparency or community benefit) each, with the sixth group being the control group. Our experiment revealed that regardless of the information given, farmers were perceived to benefit the most from CSA, followed by society and lastly by the individual. However, all participants ranked individual benefits and environmental sustainability as the most important for them, followed by solidarity with farmers, transparency and community aspects. Moreover, the results show that the more beneficial CSAs are seen, the higher the willingness to join. While information on benefits such as solidarity with farmers, nutritional quality and community are effective in reaching young, educated and often female members, nutritional benefits are addressing environmentally conscious and conservative consumers. Overall, information on nutrition and environmental sustainability led to the highest wiliness to join. By communicating primarily about the nutritional benefit and environmental sustainability of CSAs, not only about altruistic benefits, a wider spread and integration of CSA could be achieved ultimately fostering a sustainable food production and consumption mindset. • Benefit Perceptions and their Influence on the Willingness to Join Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). – Highlights • Non-members prioritize individual benefits, despite perceiving CSA as farmer-focused. • Information boosted social and farmer benefit perceptions, but not individual ones. • Perceived overall CSA benefits are the strongest predictor of willingness to join. • Information on individual benefits, such as nutrition, can broaden the membership. • CSAs need to shift narratives, emphasizing individual benefits for broader appeal.

Cleaner and Responsible ConsumptionVol. 17
University of Bern (CH), Agroscope (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Organic Food and Agriculture
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.