Benefit perceptions and their influence on the willingness to join community supported agriculture (CSA)
In this study, we focus on non-members’ benefit perception of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) and their willingness to join. We look into how information impacts the perception of CSA benefits, their relevance, and how these benefits and other factors such as trust levels, subjective knowledge, sustainable food shopping behaviour, political orientation and socio-demographics influence the willingness to join. We conducted an online between-subject experiment. Respondents (N=754) were divided in six groups, five groups were exposed to one benefit of CSA (i.e., either to the nutritional, sustainability, solidarity, transparency or community benefit) each, with the sixth group being the control group. Our experiment revealed that regardless of the information given, farmers were perceived to benefit the most from CSA, followed by society and lastly by the individual. However, all participants ranked individual benefits and environmental sustainability as the most important for them, followed by solidarity with farmers, transparency and community aspects. Moreover, the results show that the more beneficial CSAs are seen, the higher the willingness to join. While information on benefits such as solidarity with farmers, nutritional quality and community are effective in reaching young, educated and often female members, nutritional benefits are addressing environmentally conscious and conservative consumers. Overall, information on nutrition and environmental sustainability led to the highest wiliness to join. By communicating primarily about the nutritional benefit and environmental sustainability of CSAs, not only about altruistic benefits, a wider spread and integration of CSA could be achieved ultimately fostering a sustainable food production and consumption mindset. • Benefit Perceptions and their Influence on the Willingness to Join Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). – Highlights • Non-members prioritize individual benefits, despite perceiving CSA as farmer-focused. • Information boosted social and farmer benefit perceptions, but not individual ones. • Perceived overall CSA benefits are the strongest predictor of willingness to join. • Information on individual benefits, such as nutrition, can broaden the membership. • CSAs need to shift narratives, emphasizing individual benefits for broader appeal.
Authors
- Patrick Bottazzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0431-802X)
- Rita Saleh
- Stefan Galley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-9900)
Institutions
- University of Bern (CH)
- Agroscope (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
- Published
- 2025-03-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100263
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Organic Food and Agriculture
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.50
Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung