Evaluation of the cubicle hood sampler for monitoring methane production of dairy cows under barn conditions

Monitoring methane production from individual cows is necessary to evaluate the success of greenhouse gas reduction strategies. However, monitoring methane production rates ( MPR ) under practical conditions remains challenging. In this paper, we investigate the performance of a potential solution to this challenge. The cubicle hood sampler ( CHS ) is an on-barn monitoring device placed in cubicles that collects the air exhaled by the animals while they lie down. The MPR of 28 dairy cows were measured by four CHS devices and compared to the levels measured by climate respiration chambers ( CRC ). A linear regression showed no strong correlation between the two sets of estimates ( r = 0.24). The estimates made by the CHS appeared to be inaccurate due to a sampling bias (insufficient breath recovery), which could not be corrected for. Using Bayesian modelling, information was pooled across individuals to model complete methane production curves and potentially improve the accuracy of the MPR estimates. However, the model was unable to compensate for the biased observations used for fitting, and accuracy levels did not improve. An under-recovery of the breath samples by the hood is suspected. These issues must be resolved. Nevertheless, the CHS ranked cows satisfactorily, with Kendall W values of 0.625 ( p = 0.201) in the original dataset, and 0.659 ( p = 0.214) after using the model. Resolving the bias issue is expected to have a simultaneous positive effect on the agreement between the two MPR rankings. We recommend to keep using the model to convert discrete measurements into methane production curves. • Four cubicle hood samplers were tested under barn conditions. • The current design makes inaccurate estimates due to insufficient breath recovery. • Modelling could not compensate for the insufficient accuracy of the input information. • The CHS can rank cows methane production, but there is still room for improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biosystems Engineering
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2025.02.008
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the cubicle hood sampler for monitoring methane production of dairy cows under barn conditions

N.W.M. Ogink, Cécile M. Levrault, P.W.G. Groot Koerkamp, Carel F.W. Peeters
Biosystems Engineering
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Evaluation of the cubicle hood sampler for monitoring methane production of dairy cows under barn conditions

N.W.M. Ogink, Cécile M. Levrault, P.W.G. Groot Koerkamp, Carel F.W. Peeters
article en

Abstract

Monitoring methane production from individual cows is necessary to evaluate the success of greenhouse gas reduction strategies. However, monitoring methane production rates ( MPR ) under practical conditions remains challenging. In this paper, we investigate the performance of a potential solution to this challenge. The cubicle hood sampler ( CHS ) is an on-barn monitoring device placed in cubicles that collects the air exhaled by the animals while they lie down. The MPR of 28 dairy cows were measured by four CHS devices and compared to the levels measured by climate respiration chambers ( CRC ). A linear regression showed no strong correlation between the two sets of estimates ( r = 0.24). The estimates made by the CHS appeared to be inaccurate due to a sampling bias (insufficient breath recovery), which could not be corrected for. Using Bayesian modelling, information was pooled across individuals to model complete methane production curves and potentially improve the accuracy of the MPR estimates. However, the model was unable to compensate for the biased observations used for fitting, and accuracy levels did not improve. An under-recovery of the breath samples by the hood is suspected. These issues must be resolved. Nevertheless, the CHS ranked cows satisfactorily, with Kendall W values of 0.625 ( p = 0.201) in the original dataset, and 0.659 ( p = 0.214) after using the model. Resolving the bias issue is expected to have a simultaneous positive effect on the agreement between the two MPR rankings. We recommend to keep using the model to convert discrete measurements into methane production curves. • Four cubicle hood samplers were tested under barn conditions. • The current design makes inaccurate estimates due to insufficient breath recovery. • Modelling could not compensate for the insufficient accuracy of the input information. • The CHS can rank cows methane production, but there is still room for improvement.

Biosystems EngineeringVol. 252
Centre for BioSystems Genomics (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Wageningen University and Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.