Variability in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity assessment: Comparing tri-axial accelerometry cut-off points in children

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the most frequently used cut-points (CoPs) on quantification of active children, as well as to analyse children physical activity (PA) quantification using vertical axis and vector magnitude (VM). The sample comprised 303 children (160 girls) aged 6 years -10 years. Height, weight and BMI were assessed to control for confounding variables related to PA levels. The tri-axial accelerometer was used for seven consecutive days of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour (SB). A general linear model was used; the agreements of all CoPs were analyzed by Kappa index. Freedson CoPs presented the highest percentage of active children (100%) for males and females during the weekdays, weekend, and for total assessed days. The Mattocks CoPs revealed the lowest proportion of active children for the weekdays (2.97%), weekend days (3.30%), and for the seven assessed days (1.65%). The interpretation of accelerometer results must be critiqued in respect to whether children are meeting publically adopted PA guidelines. The growing variety of analytical approaches and CoPs employed to analyse and evaluate accelerometer data in children makes it difficult to compare findings across different studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2025.02.008
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity assessment: Comparing tri-axial accelerometry cut-off points in children

Larissa Loures Mendes, Daniela Rodrigues, Helena Nogueira, Cristina Padez et al.
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Variability in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity assessment: Comparing tri-axial accelerometry cut-off points in children

Larissa Loures Mendes, Daniela Rodrigues, Helena Nogueira, Cristina Padez, Aristides M. Machado‐Rodrigues, Thales Philipe Rodrigues da Silva, Augusta Gama, Pedro Silva
article en

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the most frequently used cut-points (CoPs) on quantification of active children, as well as to analyse children physical activity (PA) quantification using vertical axis and vector magnitude (VM). The sample comprised 303 children (160 girls) aged 6 years -10 years. Height, weight and BMI were assessed to control for confounding variables related to PA levels. The tri-axial accelerometer was used for seven consecutive days of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour (SB). A general linear model was used; the agreements of all CoPs were analyzed by Kappa index. Freedson CoPs presented the highest percentage of active children (100%) for males and females during the weekdays, weekend, and for total assessed days. The Mattocks CoPs revealed the lowest proportion of active children for the weekdays (2.97%), weekend days (3.30%), and for the seven assessed days (1.65%). The interpretation of accelerometer results must be critiqued in respect to whether children are meeting publically adopted PA guidelines. The growing variety of analytical approaches and CoPs employed to analyse and evaluate accelerometer data in children makes it difficult to compare findings across different studies.

Sports Medicine and Health Science
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT), University of Coimbra (PT), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.