Potential deficit irrigation adaptation strategies under climate change for sustaining cotton production in hyper–arid areas

Affected by climate change and elevated atmospheric CO 2 levels, the efficacy of agricultural management practices is of particular concern in a hyper–arid area. The effects of future climate change on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and water productivity (WP) were assessed under deficit irrigation strategies in China’s southern Xinjiang region. A previously calibrated and validated RZWQM2 model simulated cotton production for two time periods ranging between 2061–2080 and 2081–2100, under automatic irrigation method based on crop plant available water, factorially combined with four irrigation levels (100 %, 80 %, 60 %, and 50 %). Weather data was obtained from ten general circulation models, and two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways were tested. Deficit irrigation under climate change showed a simulated decrease in water use and production of cotton compared to the baseline (1960–2019). For the 2061–2080 period, mean simulated seed cotton yields were 4.43, 4.44, 3.95 and 3.47 Mg ha –1 ( vs. baseline: 4.65, 4.40, 3.58, 2.63 Mg ha −1 ) with the 100 %, 80 %, 60 % and 50 % irrigation levels. A 3.4 %-28.6 % of decrease ( vs. baseline) in seed cotton yield was found under SSP585 scenario in 2081–2100. The 80 %PAW–based irrigation provided the highest WP of 12.8 kg m –3 and 8.4 kg m –3 for 2061–2080 and 2081–2100, respectively, comparing to the baseline WP of 0.82 kg m –3 . Under SSP585 for 2081–2100, the simulated WP declined from 0.19 kg m –3 at 100 % irrigation levels to 0.04 kg m –3 at 50 % irrigation levels. These projections suggests that adequate irrigation is the key to ensure cotton production and moderate deficit irrigation can be applied to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on cotton yield in a hyper–arid area. • Deficit irrigation reduced cotton yield by 3 %-38 % under climate change. • Deficit irrigation increased cotton water productivity by 4.8 %-12.8 % under SSP245 scenario. • Water productivity decreased by 8.5 %-22 % under SSP585 for the 2081–2100. • The optimal cotton water use was 479–500 mm under climate change in hyper–arid areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109417
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Research in Cotton Cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential deficit irrigation adaptation strategies under climate change for sustaining cotton production in hyper–arid areas

Robert W. Malone, Xiaoping Chen, Kelly Robert Thorp, Dongwei GUI et al.
3 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Research in Cotton Cultivation
5.25
article

Potential deficit irrigation adaptation strategies under climate change for sustaining cotton production in hyper–arid areas

Robert W. Malone, Xiaoping Chen, Kelly Robert Thorp, Dongwei GUI, Zhiming Qi, Haibo Dong, Liwang Ma, Bo Liu, Hao Wu, Shaoyuan Feng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Affected by climate change and elevated atmospheric CO 2 levels, the efficacy of agricultural management practices is of particular concern in a hyper–arid area. The effects of future climate change on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and water productivity (WP) were assessed under deficit irrigation strategies in China’s southern Xinjiang region. A previously calibrated and validated RZWQM2 model simulated cotton production for two time periods ranging between 2061–2080 and 2081–2100, under automatic irrigation method based on crop plant available water, factorially combined with four irrigation levels (100 %, 80 %, 60 %, and 50 %). Weather data was obtained from ten general circulation models, and two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways were tested. Deficit irrigation under climate change showed a simulated decrease in water use and production of cotton compared to the baseline (1960–2019). For the 2061–2080 period, mean simulated seed cotton yields were 4.43, 4.44, 3.95 and 3.47 Mg ha –1 ( vs. baseline: 4.65, 4.40, 3.58, 2.63 Mg ha −1 ) with the 100 %, 80 %, 60 % and 50 % irrigation levels. A 3.4 %-28.6 % of decrease ( vs. baseline) in seed cotton yield was found under SSP585 scenario in 2081–2100. The 80 %PAW–based irrigation provided the highest WP of 12.8 kg m –3 and 8.4 kg m –3 for 2061–2080 and 2081–2100, respectively, comparing to the baseline WP of 0.82 kg m –3 . Under SSP585 for 2081–2100, the simulated WP declined from 0.19 kg m –3 at 100 % irrigation levels to 0.04 kg m –3 at 50 % irrigation levels. These projections suggests that adequate irrigation is the key to ensure cotton production and moderate deficit irrigation can be applied to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on cotton yield in a hyper–arid area. • Deficit irrigation reduced cotton yield by 3 %-38 % under climate change. • Deficit irrigation increased cotton water productivity by 4.8 %-12.8 % under SSP245 scenario. • Water productivity decreased by 8.5 %-22 % under SSP585 for the 2081–2100. • The optimal cotton water use was 479–500 mm under climate change in hyper–arid areas.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 312
Agricultural Research Service (US), Center for Agricultural Resources Research (US), National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (US), Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory (US), McGill University (CA), Yangzhou University (CN)
Climate action, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Research in Cotton Cultivation
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.