Lights, <scp>KAMs</scp> , Action!: Nonprofits and Key Audit Matters Disclosure Choice as a Signaling Mechanism

ABSTRACT Recent changes to American Institute of Certified Public Accountant auditing standards now allow US private and nonprofit entities to voluntarily engage their auditor to include key audit matters (KAMs) communications in their audit report. We rely on signaling theory to help assess potential benefits and drawbacks of KAMs audit report disclosure and seek to understand the potential effects of KAMs on nonprofit organizations and related stakeholder groups from the perspective of nonprofits considering whether to engage their auditor to disclose KAMs. While limited extant research primarily considers the effects of such disclosures on for‐profit entities, this research note contributes to a small, yet burgeoning literature on this timely topic by considering the effects of KAMs in the context of signaling theory on different nonprofit stakeholder groups. An important takeaway is that nonprofits should take into account their specific mix of stakeholders when considering KAMs disclosure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21656
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lights, KAMs , Action!: Nonprofits and Key Audit Matters Disclosure Choice as a Signaling Mechanism

Melissa Intindola, Cari Burke‐Kolehmainen
2 citations
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
article

Lights, KAMs , Action!: Nonprofits and Key Audit Matters Disclosure Choice as a Signaling Mechanism

Melissa Intindola, Cari Burke‐Kolehmainen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent changes to American Institute of Certified Public Accountant auditing standards now allow US private and nonprofit entities to voluntarily engage their auditor to include key audit matters (KAMs) communications in their audit report. We rely on signaling theory to help assess potential benefits and drawbacks of KAMs audit report disclosure and seek to understand the potential effects of KAMs on nonprofit organizations and related stakeholder groups from the perspective of nonprofits considering whether to engage their auditor to disclose KAMs. While limited extant research primarily considers the effects of such disclosures on for‐profit entities, this research note contributes to a small, yet burgeoning literature on this timely topic by considering the effects of KAMs in the context of signaling theory on different nonprofit stakeholder groups. An important takeaway is that nonprofits should take into account their specific mix of stakeholders when considering KAMs disclosure.

Nonprofit Management and LeadershipVol. 35(4)
Bucknell University (US), Western Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lights, <scp>KAMs</scp> , Action!: Nonprofits and Key Audit Matters Disclosure Choice as a Signaling Mechanism — Melissa Intindola, Cari Burke‐Kolehmainen · Nonprofit Management and Leadership (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS