What is (not) ghosting? A theoretical analysis via three key pillars

Ghosting, unilaterally ceasing communication without providing any explanation, has emerged as a prevalent and perplexing form of relationship dissolution. Despite its increasing occurrence, existing definitions of ghosting remain inconclusive and occasionally contradictory. Theoretical frameworks such as relationship dissolution and social exclusion models are in some ways appropriate for understanding ghosting but fail to provide a fully comprehensive understanding. This theoretical analysis addresses the gaps by delineating the specificities and boundaries of ghosting through three key pillars. First (1), we examine the nature of the social connections and types of relationships in which ghosting occurs, as dissolution dynamics differ across romantic partnerships, friendships, or professional relationships. Second (2), we investigate technology's (potentially) pivotal role in ghosting, considering whether ghosting is as contemporary as the terminology suggests. Third, we explore the temporal elements of ghosting (3) discussing the suddenness and definitiveness of ghosting events. Based on this theoretical analysis, we propose the following renovated definition of ghosting: Ghosting is a form of ostracism predominantly enacted through digital technology that consists of a unilateral, sudden or gradual cease of communication without explanation to end a meaningful relationship definitively . Additionally, we discuss neighboring phenomena (e.g., orbiting, breadcrumbing) that are closely similar but distinguishable from ghosting. Lastly, we emphasize the subjectivity of ghosting experiences, highlighting perceptual gaps between ghosters and those being ghosted (‘ghostees’). With this contribution, we present a theoretical framework for studying ghosting and establish the groundwork for future research, facilitating a better comprehension of ghosting's definition within various relationship contexts. • Ghosting involves a sudden or gradual end to communication without explanation. • Current definitions of ghosting are inconclusive and sometimes contradictory. • Theoretical models fall short in fully capturing the complexity of ghosting. • We theoretically analyze ghosting by relationship type, technology, and timing. • A new definition emphasizes ghosting's relational, digital, and temporal context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108637
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is (not) ghosting? A theoretical analysis via three key pillars

Janneke M. Schokkenbroek, Luca Pancani, Paolo Riva, Alessia Telari
9 citations
Computers in Human Behavior
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
21.95
article

What is (not) ghosting? A theoretical analysis via three key pillars

Janneke M. Schokkenbroek, Luca Pancani, Paolo Riva, Alessia Telari
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Ghosting, unilaterally ceasing communication without providing any explanation, has emerged as a prevalent and perplexing form of relationship dissolution. Despite its increasing occurrence, existing definitions of ghosting remain inconclusive and occasionally contradictory. Theoretical frameworks such as relationship dissolution and social exclusion models are in some ways appropriate for understanding ghosting but fail to provide a fully comprehensive understanding. This theoretical analysis addresses the gaps by delineating the specificities and boundaries of ghosting through three key pillars. First (1), we examine the nature of the social connections and types of relationships in which ghosting occurs, as dissolution dynamics differ across romantic partnerships, friendships, or professional relationships. Second (2), we investigate technology's (potentially) pivotal role in ghosting, considering whether ghosting is as contemporary as the terminology suggests. Third, we explore the temporal elements of ghosting (3) discussing the suddenness and definitiveness of ghosting events. Based on this theoretical analysis, we propose the following renovated definition of ghosting: Ghosting is a form of ostracism predominantly enacted through digital technology that consists of a unilateral, sudden or gradual cease of communication without explanation to end a meaningful relationship definitively . Additionally, we discuss neighboring phenomena (e.g., orbiting, breadcrumbing) that are closely similar but distinguishable from ghosting. Lastly, we emphasize the subjectivity of ghosting experiences, highlighting perceptual gaps between ghosters and those being ghosted (‘ghostees’). With this contribution, we present a theoretical framework for studying ghosting and establish the groundwork for future research, facilitating a better comprehension of ghosting's definition within various relationship contexts. • Ghosting involves a sudden or gradual end to communication without explanation. • Current definitions of ghosting are inconclusive and sometimes contradictory. • Theoretical models fall short in fully capturing the complexity of ghosting. • We theoretically analyze ghosting by relationship type, technology, and timing. • A new definition emphasizes ghosting's relational, digital, and temporal context.

Computers in Human BehaviorVol. 168
Ghent University (BE), iMinds (BE), Institut National de Criminalistique et de Criminologie (BE), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
21.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.