Hyperspectral indicators and characterization of glyphosate-induced stress in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)

· Treatments induced both lethal and sub-lethal hormetic CHEAL response to glyphosate · 31 key wavelengths capture CHEAL spectral response to glyphosate · Four vegetation indices best described glyphosate-induced herbicide injury in CHEAL · Regression modeling failed to capture CHEAL's biphasic dose-response to glyphosate · Random forest minimized model residual and predictive errors Hyperspectral sensors are increasingly used to develop optimized vegetation indices (VIs) that capture plant spectral response to specific stressors. The project goal was to develop quantitative metrics for characterization of weed response to herbicide application. This work applied hyperspectral sensing to describe and predict the spectral response of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L., CHEAL) to glyphosate application. Thirteen treatments, including one glyphosate rate used alone or in combination with eleven adjuvants plus one nontreated control, were applied to CHEAL seedlings cultivated in a greenhouse. Visible injury ratings and non-imaging hyperspectral data were collected 14 days after treatment application. Sensor data processing included cleaning, normalization, smoothing, and spectral reduction. The treatments resulted in a significant (P < 0.001) gradient of injury ranging from 0 to 98%, with visible differences in leaf spectral signatures. Thirty-one key wavelengths were identified using principal component analysis, relief-f feature selection, and Bayesian discriminant analysis and used to create 45,732 VIs. No single VI accurately described CHEAL injury (minimum mean absolute error (MAE) = 14.0%). A random forest algorithm developed using four VIs adequately described CHEAL injury with an MAE of 7.7%. Post-calibration was not needed to improve the random forest model performance (P ≥ 0.05). Therefore, hyperspectral sensing could be used to quantify weed response to herbicide application and overcome the limitations of visual methods current in use. Further development of this method and validation will allow development of a platform for high-throughput phenotyping of weed response to herbicide application and screening for herbicide resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100890
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperspectral indicators and characterization of glyphosate-induced stress in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)

Nilda R. Burgos, Aurelie M. Poncet, Juan Camilo Velásquez, Kristofor R. Brye et al.
1 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Hyperspectral indicators and characterization of glyphosate-induced stress in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)

Nilda R. Burgos, Aurelie M. Poncet, Juan Camilo Velásquez, Kristofor R. Brye, Amanda J. Ashworth, Cengiz Koparan, O. Wesley France, M. Claudia Ruiz Soto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

· Treatments induced both lethal and sub-lethal hormetic CHEAL response to glyphosate · 31 key wavelengths capture CHEAL spectral response to glyphosate · Four vegetation indices best described glyphosate-induced herbicide injury in CHEAL · Regression modeling failed to capture CHEAL's biphasic dose-response to glyphosate · Random forest minimized model residual and predictive errors Hyperspectral sensors are increasingly used to develop optimized vegetation indices (VIs) that capture plant spectral response to specific stressors. The project goal was to develop quantitative metrics for characterization of weed response to herbicide application. This work applied hyperspectral sensing to describe and predict the spectral response of common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L., CHEAL) to glyphosate application. Thirteen treatments, including one glyphosate rate used alone or in combination with eleven adjuvants plus one nontreated control, were applied to CHEAL seedlings cultivated in a greenhouse. Visible injury ratings and non-imaging hyperspectral data were collected 14 days after treatment application. Sensor data processing included cleaning, normalization, smoothing, and spectral reduction. The treatments resulted in a significant (P < 0.001) gradient of injury ranging from 0 to 98%, with visible differences in leaf spectral signatures. Thirty-one key wavelengths were identified using principal component analysis, relief-f feature selection, and Bayesian discriminant analysis and used to create 45,732 VIs. No single VI accurately described CHEAL injury (minimum mean absolute error (MAE) = 14.0%). A random forest algorithm developed using four VIs adequately described CHEAL injury with an MAE of 7.7%. Post-calibration was not needed to improve the random forest model performance (P ≥ 0.05). Therefore, hyperspectral sensing could be used to quantify weed response to herbicide application and overcome the limitations of visual methods current in use. Further development of this method and validation will allow development of a platform for high-throughput phenotyping of weed response to herbicide application and screening for herbicide resistance.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 11
University of Arkansas System (US), U.S. National Poultry Research Center (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.