The quality of face-to-face and digitally mediated social interactions: two experience sampling studies exploring the moderating role of physical location, interaction partner familiarity, and interaction purpose

Abstract This study examines how communication modality influences social interaction quality and its contingency on three other situational characteristics: physical location, partner familiarity, and interaction purpose. Data from two experience sampling studies including 385 Spanish emerging adults and 10,203 social interaction reports revealed that compared to face-to-face interactions, phone calls were rated higher, video calls showed no significant difference, and text-based and social media interactions (e.g., commenting) were rated lower. However, other situational factors mattered. For example, video calls at home were perceived as higher in quality than face-to-face, whereas face-to-face was superior outside the home. For partner familiarity, social media interactions with weak (vs. strong) ties were of significantly lower quality. For interaction purpose, texting was superior to face-to-face in leveraging social interaction quality when having negative (vs. maintenance) interactions. Combined, the results thus plead for greater consideration of the situation when examining the effects of (mediated) interpersonal communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaf004
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
121.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The quality of face-to-face and digitally mediated social interactions: two experience sampling studies exploring the moderating role of physical location, interaction partner familiarity, and interaction purpose

Charo Sádaba, Aurelio Fernández, Javier García‐Manglano, Mariek Vanden Abeele et al.
8 citations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Media Influence and Health
121.40
article

The quality of face-to-face and digitally mediated social interactions: two experience sampling studies exploring the moderating role of physical location, interaction partner familiarity, and interaction purpose

Charo Sádaba, Aurelio Fernández, Javier García‐Manglano, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Timon Elmer
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how communication modality influences social interaction quality and its contingency on three other situational characteristics: physical location, partner familiarity, and interaction purpose. Data from two experience sampling studies including 385 Spanish emerging adults and 10,203 social interaction reports revealed that compared to face-to-face interactions, phone calls were rated higher, video calls showed no significant difference, and text-based and social media interactions (e.g., commenting) were rated lower. However, other situational factors mattered. For example, video calls at home were perceived as higher in quality than face-to-face, whereas face-to-face was superior outside the home. For partner familiarity, social media interactions with weak (vs. strong) ties were of significantly lower quality. For interaction purpose, texting was superior to face-to-face in leveraging social interaction quality when having negative (vs. maintenance) interactions. Combined, the results thus plead for greater consideration of the situation when examining the effects of (mediated) interpersonal communication.

Journal of Computer-Mediated CommunicationVol. 30(2)
University of Zurich (CH), Ghent University (BE), iMinds (BE), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Media Influence and Health
121.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.