“There Will Always Be Opposition”: Collegiate Coaches’ and Athletic Administrators’ Perceptions of LGBTQIA+ Pride Initiatives

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA+) individuals face adversity in the form of rejection, stereotypes, discrimination, and violence. In an effort to promote inclusion and allyship, several professional and collegiate athletic programs have begun hosting Pride events. The purpose of this study was to better understand the perceptions and decision-making process of college athletic administrators and coaches regarding Pride programming. Using convenience and snowball sampling, 12 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletic administrators and coaches participated in semistructured interviews. Findings revealed that although Pride programming is currently implemented by many National Collegiate Athletic Association member institutions, several factors contribute to athletic administrators’ and coaches’ reluctance to engage in Pride-specific programming. Although significant barriers are discussed, participants agreed that the benefits to developing Pride programming are substantively impactful at both the university and community levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Sport Journal
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2024-0010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“There Will Always Be Opposition”: Collegiate Coaches’ and Athletic Administrators’ Perceptions of LGBTQIA+ Pride Initiatives

Sarah Stokowski, Arianna D. McClain, Michael Godfrey, Chris Corr et al.
2 citations
Sociology of Sport Journal
Sports, Gender, and Society
7.73
article

“There Will Always Be Opposition”: Collegiate Coaches’ and Athletic Administrators’ Perceptions of LGBTQIA+ Pride Initiatives

Sarah Stokowski, Arianna D. McClain, Michael Godfrey, Chris Corr, Nicole Rudnitsky
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA+) individuals face adversity in the form of rejection, stereotypes, discrimination, and violence. In an effort to promote inclusion and allyship, several professional and collegiate athletic programs have begun hosting Pride events. The purpose of this study was to better understand the perceptions and decision-making process of college athletic administrators and coaches regarding Pride programming. Using convenience and snowball sampling, 12 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletic administrators and coaches participated in semistructured interviews. Findings revealed that although Pride programming is currently implemented by many National Collegiate Athletic Association member institutions, several factors contribute to athletic administrators’ and coaches’ reluctance to engage in Pride-specific programming. Although significant barriers are discussed, participants agreed that the benefits to developing Pride programming are substantively impactful at both the university and community levels.

Sociology of Sport JournalVol. 42(3)
Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports, Gender, and Society
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.