PuMMA blind benchmark: Performance of high plutonium content MOX fuel under irradiation

• Code-to-code benchmark analysis of fuel performance for high Pu content MOX fuels under irradiation. • Significant discrepancies in predictions for temperature, gap size, and fission gas release across different codes. • Sensitivity analysis identified key modeling needs for fuel and cladding behavior. • This work provides key insights to guide the next phase and future benchmarks, validating code predictions with PIE data. This paper presents the results of the first phase of the benchmark exercise in the PuMMA project, aimed at extending the reliability of fuel performance codes for Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuels with high plutonium content. The exercise involved the simulation of three irradiation experiments: (1) CAPRIX (45 % of Pu) carried out in the PHENIX reactor in France, (2) TRABANT1 (45 % of Pu) and (3) TRABANT2 (40 % of Pu) irradiated in the HFR reactor in The Netherlands. Thirteen organizations from nine countries participated, using eight different fuel performance codes. In this phase, besides the fuel specifications, boundary conditions such as linear heat rate, irradiation history, and cladding external temperature were provided. In a “blind” exercise, all codes were free to choose suitable models and correlations for the simulation without access to the experimental results. The main results of the “blind” phase are performed along with a sensitivity analysis to investigate the impact of various uncertainties on measurements, irradiation and input parameters. Significant discrepancies were observed among the different codes, attributed to the use of heterogeneous reference correlations and the absence of suitable models for some MOX-specific phenomena. Finally, insights are offered for the second phase of the benchmark, where the fuel performance codes’ capabilities will be assessed against experimental results from Post-Irradiation Examinations of all three pins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113960
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Nuclear Materials and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PuMMA blind benchmark: Performance of high plutonium content MOX fuel under irradiation

Slavomír Bebjak, Benoît Perrin, V. Blanc, Antonio Jiménez-Carrascosa et al.
4 citations
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Materials and Properties
2.07
article

PuMMA blind benchmark: Performance of high plutonium content MOX fuel under irradiation

Slavomír Bebjak, Benoît Perrin, V. Blanc, Antonio Jiménez-Carrascosa, J. Gadó, Vincent Dupont, T. Chrebet, Carlo Fiorina, L. Luzzi, D. Pizzocri, Alessandro Del Nevo, Sergei E. Lemehov, Jouko Peltonen, Karl J. X. Sturm, Guillaume Michel, Jean Lavarenne, Konstantin Mikityuk, A. Magni, Edoardo Luciano Brunetto, Y. Wang, Ctibor Strmensky, Alessandro Scolaro, E. Deveaux, Vitezslav Matocha, Beate Burger, D. Jaramillo-Sierra, L. Argeles, Magda Stefanowska-Skrodzka
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Code-to-code benchmark analysis of fuel performance for high Pu content MOX fuels under irradiation. • Significant discrepancies in predictions for temperature, gap size, and fission gas release across different codes. • Sensitivity analysis identified key modeling needs for fuel and cladding behavior. • This work provides key insights to guide the next phase and future benchmarks, validating code predictions with PIE data. This paper presents the results of the first phase of the benchmark exercise in the PuMMA project, aimed at extending the reliability of fuel performance codes for Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuels with high plutonium content. The exercise involved the simulation of three irradiation experiments: (1) CAPRIX (45 % of Pu) carried out in the PHENIX reactor in France, (2) TRABANT1 (45 % of Pu) and (3) TRABANT2 (40 % of Pu) irradiated in the HFR reactor in The Netherlands. Thirteen organizations from nine countries participated, using eight different fuel performance codes. In this phase, besides the fuel specifications, boundary conditions such as linear heat rate, irradiation history, and cladding external temperature were provided. In a “blind” exercise, all codes were free to choose suitable models and correlations for the simulation without access to the experimental results. The main results of the “blind” phase are performed along with a sensitivity analysis to investigate the impact of various uncertainties on measurements, irradiation and input parameters. Significant discrepancies were observed among the different codes, attributed to the use of heterogeneous reference correlations and the absence of suitable models for some MOX-specific phenomena. Finally, insights are offered for the second phase of the benchmark, where the fuel performance codes’ capabilities will be assessed against experimental results from Post-Irradiation Examinations of all three pins.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 435
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Konkoly Observatory (HU), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), Research Centre Rez (CZ), Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital (GB), Électricité de France (France) (FR), Nuclear Research Institute Rez (Czechia) (CZ), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Orano (United States) (US), Texas A&M University (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Horizon 2020, H2020 Euratom
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Nuclear Materials and Properties
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.