Empower instructors with actionable insights: Mine and visualize student written feedback for instructors’ reflection

Student feedback on teaching at the end of the semester is an important source of information for instructors to gain insights into the effectiveness of their teaching. There are usually two forms of student feedback: quantitative scores and qualitative feedback. Quantitative scores can usually be easily summarised, while the analysis of qualitative feedback is usually effort-intensive as it deals with text. To help instructors glean insights from students’ qualitative feedback, many previous studies used unsupervised approaches (i.e., topic modelling) for topic extraction in student feedback. Although topic modelling enables automated detection of previously unseen topics with minimal human effort, the generated topics are often incomprehensible and limited, as they were primarily derived from frequently occurring words. This study aims to extend previous research by developing a supervised text mining approach that integrates content analysis and a transformer-based pre-trained large language model to extract topic and sentiment categorization in student qualitative feedback. These categories are then visualized together with the quantitative scores to provide holistic insights for instructors’ reflection and action. The purpose of this paper is to present the novel approach we developed to mine and visualize student qualitative feedback. It offers a holistic approach for higher education institutions to mine and visualize students’ quality feedback, providing instructors with actionable insights for improving their teaching practices. • It integrated content analysis with a transformer-based pre-trained large language model (i.e., BERT) to mine the topics and sentiments in student qualitative feedback. • It developed an interactive analytic tool to visualize the mined text alongside quantitative feedback to facilitate teachers’ reflection on their teaching practices. • It contributes to the literature by enriching methods for mining qualitative feedback • It offers insights for universities/organizations looking to develop their own feedback analytics tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100389
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empower instructors with actionable insights: Mine and visualize student written feedback for instructors’ reflection

Rebekah Wei Ying Lim, Yew Haur Lee, Chenchen Li, Feng Lin
2 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
article

Empower instructors with actionable insights: Mine and visualize student written feedback for instructors’ reflection

Rebekah Wei Ying Lim, Yew Haur Lee, Chenchen Li, Feng Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Student feedback on teaching at the end of the semester is an important source of information for instructors to gain insights into the effectiveness of their teaching. There are usually two forms of student feedback: quantitative scores and qualitative feedback. Quantitative scores can usually be easily summarised, while the analysis of qualitative feedback is usually effort-intensive as it deals with text. To help instructors glean insights from students’ qualitative feedback, many previous studies used unsupervised approaches (i.e., topic modelling) for topic extraction in student feedback. Although topic modelling enables automated detection of previously unseen topics with minimal human effort, the generated topics are often incomprehensible and limited, as they were primarily derived from frequently occurring words. This study aims to extend previous research by developing a supervised text mining approach that integrates content analysis and a transformer-based pre-trained large language model to extract topic and sentiment categorization in student qualitative feedback. These categories are then visualized together with the quantitative scores to provide holistic insights for instructors’ reflection and action. The purpose of this paper is to present the novel approach we developed to mine and visualize student qualitative feedback. It offers a holistic approach for higher education institutions to mine and visualize students’ quality feedback, providing instructors with actionable insights for improving their teaching practices. • It integrated content analysis with a transformer-based pre-trained large language model (i.e., BERT) to mine the topics and sentiments in student qualitative feedback. • It developed an interactive analytic tool to visualize the mined text alongside quantitative feedback to facilitate teachers’ reflection on their teaching practices. • It contributes to the literature by enriching methods for mining qualitative feedback • It offers insights for universities/organizations looking to develop their own feedback analytics tool.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8
Singapore University of Social Sciences (SG)
Singapore University of Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.