Systematic exploration of the non-geometric flux landscape

Abstract Given the huge size of the generic four-dimens-ional scalar potentials arising from the type II supergravities based on toroidal orientifolds, it is even hard to analytically solve the extremization conditions, and therefore the previous studies have been mainly focused on taking some numerical approaches. In this work, using the so-called axionic flux polynomials we demonstrate that the scalar potential and the extremization conditions can be simplified to a great extent, leading to the possibility of performing an analytic exploration of the flux landscape. In this regard, we consider the isotropic case of a type IIB model based on the standard $${\mathbb T}^6/({\mathbb Z}_2 \times {\mathbb Z}_2)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> orientifold having the three-form fluxes $$F_3/H_3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and the non-geometric Q -flux. This model results in around 300 terms in the scalar potential which depend on 6 moduli/axionic fields and 14 flux parameters. Considering that the axionic flux polynomials can take either zero or non-zero values results in the need of analyzing $$2^{14}=16{,}384$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>16</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>384</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> candidate configurations, and we find that more than 16,200 of those result in No-Go scenarios for Minkowskian/de-Sitter vacua. Based on our systematic exploration of non-tachyonic flux vacua, we present a detailed classification of such No-Go scenarios as well as the leftover “undecided” configurations for which we could not conclude about the presence/absence of the stable Minkowskian/de-Sitter vacua.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13980-x
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic exploration of the non-geometric flux landscape

Pramod Shukla, G.K. Leontaris, Xin Gao, Shehu AbdusSalam
The European Physical Journal C
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
article

Systematic exploration of the non-geometric flux landscape

Pramod Shukla, G.K. Leontaris, Xin Gao, Shehu AbdusSalam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Given the huge size of the generic four-dimens-ional scalar potentials arising from the type II supergravities based on toroidal orientifolds, it is even hard to analytically solve the extremization conditions, and therefore the previous studies have been mainly focused on taking some numerical approaches. In this work, using the so-called axionic flux polynomials we demonstrate that the scalar potential and the extremization conditions can be simplified to a great extent, leading to the possibility of performing an analytic exploration of the flux landscape. In this regard, we consider the isotropic case of a type IIB model based on the standard $${\mathbb T}^6/({\mathbb Z}_2 \times {\mathbb Z}_2)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> orientifold having the three-form fluxes $$F_3/H_3$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and the non-geometric Q -flux. This model results in around 300 terms in the scalar potential which depend on 6 moduli/axionic fields and 14 flux parameters. Considering that the axionic flux polynomials can take either zero or non-zero values results in the need of analyzing $$2^{14}=16{,}384$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>16</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>384</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> candidate configurations, and we find that more than 16,200 of those result in No-Go scenarios for Minkowskian/de-Sitter vacua. Based on our systematic exploration of non-tachyonic flux vacua, we present a detailed classification of such No-Go scenarios as well as the leftover “undecided” configurations for which we could not conclude about the presence/absence of the stable Minkowskian/de-Sitter vacua.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(3)
Bose Institute (IN), University of Ioannina (GR), Sichuan University (CN), Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.