Conceptions of nature of technology in educational research: a systematic literature review

Abstract Since the inception of Technology Education, the learning area and its advocates have struggled for legitimacy. Part of this challenge stems from difficulties in articulating the nature of technology (NoT) and its unique contribution to education. This article presents a systematic review of NoT in educational research, analysing empirical studies that investigate teachers’ conceptions of NoT. An analysis of the 22 included studies showed significant differences in the ways that NoT is theorised in educational research. In highlighting both the complexity of NoT and Technology Education as a learning area, 11 distinct aspects of NoT were identified in this study. This analysis also revealed tensions between a focus on specific technology/ies and Technology-as-phenomenon , suggesting the need for conceptual coherence in future research. Implications are drawn for understanding NoT, Technology Education, and the position of Technology Education in broader education narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-09969-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptions of nature of technology in educational research: a systematic literature review

Andrew Doyle
3 citations
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Gender and Technology in Education
11.60
article

Conceptions of nature of technology in educational research: a systematic literature review

Andrew Doyle
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Since the inception of Technology Education, the learning area and its advocates have struggled for legitimacy. Part of this challenge stems from difficulties in articulating the nature of technology (NoT) and its unique contribution to education. This article presents a systematic review of NoT in educational research, analysing empirical studies that investigate teachers’ conceptions of NoT. An analysis of the 22 included studies showed significant differences in the ways that NoT is theorised in educational research. In highlighting both the complexity of NoT and Technology Education as a learning area, 11 distinct aspects of NoT were identified in this study. This analysis also revealed tensions between a focus on specific technology/ies and Technology-as-phenomenon , suggesting the need for conceptual coherence in future research. Implications are drawn for understanding NoT, Technology Education, and the position of Technology Education in broader education narratives.

International Journal of Technology and Design EducationVol. 35(5)
University of Waikato (NZ)
University of Waikato
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender and Technology in Education
11.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptions of nature of technology in educational research: a systematic literature review — Andrew Doyle · International Journal of Technology and Design Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS